The World Science Fiction Society

Minutes of the Business Meeting at Bucconeer

Thursday 6th August 1998 to Saturday 8th August 1998

All three meetings were held in room 343 of the Baltimore Convention Centre. The podium officers were:

Chairman: Tim Illingworth

Deputy Presiding Officer: Don Eastlake

Timekeeper: Kevin Standlee (Standing in for Kathy Westhead

on Thursday, understudying her on Friday and Saturday.)

Secretary: Pat McMurray

Master-at-Arms: Robbie Bourget

[Secretary: The debates in these minutes are not word for word accurate, but every attempt has been made to represent the sense of the arguments made. UK spelling is used throughout, except in some of the attached documents (because that’s the way I spell.) Names are deliberately chosen to be the informal versions. These minutes are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and recollection and are based on contemporary notes, transcribed to electronic form within one week of the conclusion of the meeting. Any other comments or notes I have will be marked in this fashion. Comments thus are purely informative and do not form part of the official text of this minutes.]

Minutes completed: 14th August 1998

Pat McMurray

Business Meeting Secretary

Appendices: A: Preliminary Business Meeting Agenda

B: Main Business Meeting Agenda

C: Site Selection Business Meeting Agenda

D: Handout: Business Passed On from LoneStarCon II

E: Handout: New Motions

F: Attendance List

G: Committee Report: Polishing the Hugos

H: Committee Report: Mark Protection Committee

I: Worldcon Site Selection Results - Final *

J: US Map with 250 & 500 mile circles *

K: Mileage Charts (2 sheets)

L: WSFS Constitution, with amendments ratified at Bucconeer

M: Business Passed On to Aussiecon Three

N: Proposed Agenda for Aussiecon Three

O: The Millennium Philcon PR0

P: Financial Report: Magicon

Q: Financial Report: ConAdian

R: Financial Report: Intersection

S: Financial Report: L.A.con III*

T: Financial Report: LoneStarCon II

U: Financial Report: Bucconeer

V: Financial Report: Aussiecon Three

*Not currently included

The World Science Fiction Society

Preliminary Business Meeting at Bucconeer

Thursday 6th August 1998, 10:00 AM

Chairman called meeting to order at 10:05 AM. Attendance as recorded on the sign-up sheets for this meeting was 63. The meeting was reminded that Chairman decided debate times, subject to amendments from the floor.

0.0 Point of Privilege

0.1 Point of Privilege on the Rights of the Assembly, raised by Robert

Sacks.

"That last year’s Business Meeting Secretary changed newly adopted Standing Rule 13 from "agendized" to "main" which was a substantive change (improving the wording by eliminating a hole). Substantive changes to the Standing Rules by the Secretary are prohibited by Standing Rule 23. I therefore move on a point of privilege to ratify the change."

Ruling by the Chairman of the Business Meeting:

"I rule that this point is not well taken, for the following reasons:"

"1. In the context of the WSFS Business Meeting, the change is not substantive. All main motions coming before the meeting are on the agenda and thus are agendized, whether or not they appear on the printed agenda, and any subsidiary motions appearing on the printed agenda derive their times from the main motions to which they adhere, and

"2. The Customs & Practices of WSFS allow for such changes by the Business Meeting Secretary."

Ben Yalow: Part 2 of Chairman’s ruling is not well taken, but part 1 is sufficient as "Master in Our Own House" has not been ratified.

The Chairman agreed.

1.0 Committee Reports

1.1 Mark Protection Committee

The Mark Protection Committee will report tomorrow.

The floor was opened for nominations to the Committee:

Robert Sacks nominated Tim Illingworth (Rest of World)

Johnny Carruthers nominated Kevin Standlee (Western)

Mark Olson nominated Ben Yalow (Eastern)

Stephen Boucher nominated Randy Shepherd (Central)

Chairman ruled it was in order to nominate sitting members of the Mark Protection Committee

Don Eastlake nominated Ken Smookler (Central)

All five nominees accepted nomination and confirmed their zones as above

1.2 The Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee

An oral report for the Nitpicking and Flyspecking Committee was provided by Don Eastlake:

The Nitpicking and Flyspecking Committee has reported out two motions (Item 4.2 and item 5.2) & requests to continue for a further year.

Don Eastlake: MOVE that Committee be continued for a further year. This was seconded and passed.

 

1.3 Worldcon Runners Guide Editorial Committee

There was no report from the Worldcon Runners Guide Editorial Committee as Ross Pavlac has passed on.

Robert Sacks: MOVE that Saul Jaffe and two others of his choice be appointed to continue this work. This was seconded.

Ben Yalow: MOVE that we request Saul Jaffe to mirror the site. This was seconded.

Both motions were passed.

Kevin Standlee: MOVE that when the Preliminary Business Meeting adjourns, we adjourn in memory of Ross Pavlac. This was seconded and passed.

Bruce Pelz: Ask the meeting and committee to consider renaming the Worldcon Runners Guide after Ross Pavlac and continuing the written version.

1.4 Extending Dramatic Presentation Eligibility to Entire Seasons

This item was postponed to Main Business Meeting.

2.0 Worldcon Reports

2.1 Reports of Past Worldcons

2.1.1 Magicon (1992)

2.1.2 ConAdian (1994)

2.1.3 Intersection (1995)

2.1.4 L.A.con III (1996)

2.1.5 LoneStarCon 2 (1997)

LoneStarCon 2 Interim Financial report was submitted.

2.2 Reports of Seated Worldcons and NASFiCs

2.2.1 Bucconeer (1998)

2.2.2 Conucopia (1999 NASFiC)

2.2.3 Aussiecon Three (1999)

Aussiecon Three Interim Financial Report was submitted.

Ben Yalow asked what currency the report was in. Stephen Boucher advised this was in Australian dollars.

[Secretary: On 13th August 1998, there were approximately AUS$1.68 to US$1 and AUS$2.73 to GBP£1]

2.2.4 Chicon 2000 (2000)

3.0 Business passed on from LoneStarCon 2

Chairman proposed that in the absence of objections from the floor each amendment would be allowed six minutes of debate.

3.1 "Master in Our Own House" - Six minutes

3.2 "Polishing the Hugos" (Including report of the Hugo Polishing Committee.) - Six minutes.

Lew Wolkoff: Raise a point of order that the Chairman had violated Standing Rule 20, as the Chairman had not contacted him in order to participate. Lew only wished this to be minuted, as he will retrospectively sign on to the report and not raise other objections.

The Chairman apologised to Lew Wolkoff and the meeting. It had slipped the Chairman’s mind while arranging Marcia Kelly Illingworth's work permit & immigration into the UK..

Robert Sacks: MOVE to commend Chairman for getting his priorities right. Seconded and passed.

Robert Sacks: MOVE to discuss this item today. This was not seconded.

3.3 "Committee Responsibility" - Six minutes

3.4 "Mark Protection Committee Clarifications" - Six minutes

3.5 "Eligibility" - Six minutes

3.6 "Yet More Business" - Six minutes

3.7 "Not Just Books" - Six minutes

4.0 New Business Part I

4.1 Petition to extend Susan Matthews’ Campbell Award Eligibility

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of petition]

John Lorentz (F): In the spirit of Section 2.3 ask the Business Meeting to extend eligibility. Stanley Schmidt [editor of Analog and sponsor of the award] and the Hugo administrator for Aussiecon Three are happy with this suggestion.

Ben Yalow (A): Believe eligibility should be extended, but that the Campbell award is outside the Business Meetings responsibility.

MOVE an amendment by substitution: The Business Meeting would commend Mr Schmidt if he extended Susan Matthews’ Campbell Award eligibility.

Mark Olson (A): Our good name supports the Campbell Award, we should stand behind this.

Robert Sacks (F): Shouldn’t use this to amend Constitution.

John Lorentz (A): Feel it’s appropriate to ask for this extension, but we cannot demand it.

Ben Yalow: As the objections are minuted, and this request for extension does not form a precedent, ask permission to withdraw motion.

No objections to withdrawal from floor.

[Secretary: Return to main motion.]

Robert Sacks (F): Let’s do the right thing.

The resolution as written was adopted by the meeting.

Susan Matthews placed on record her thanks to the Business Meeting and the Hugo Committees of Bucconeer and Aussiecon Three.

4.2 Short Titles

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

Robert Sacks: Want reassurance that these changes were not substantive.

Chairman so assured.

George Flynn: Flyspecking is mis-spelt on motion.

Chairman apologised and blamed Secretary.

Amendment was carried, no objection. As ratification is not necessary this amendment forms part of the WSFS Constitution.

5.0 New Business Part II

5.1 Proposal to change the designation of the Hugo Awards from "Best" to "Most Popular"

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of petition]

Object to consideration.

More than two thirds were opposed to consideration, so amendment failed.

Anne Davenport: MOVE to refer to Hugo Polishing Committee.

Chairman ruled this out of order as Hugo Polishing Committee had not been continued.

5.2 Tidying Site Selection

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

Chairman suggested six minutes.

Lew Wolkoff suggested seven minutes.

After some general discussion, mostly about punctuation in the text, six minutes was agreed.

5.3 No-Zone Rotation

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

Victoria Smith: Object to consideration

Seconded, but as less than two thirds were against consideration, this objection failed.

Robert Sacks: MOVE to appoint a committee to report back to Business Meeting on antizones.

Ben Yalow (A): Antizones are even more complicated.

Alex von Thorn (A): Not yet enough public discussion.

Lew Wolkoff: Point of Inquiry: What happens to Section 3.8 of current Constitution.

Chairman: Section 3.8 will be left in place for Mark Protection Committee.

Motion to refer to Committee was defeated.

Saul Jaffe: MOVE to change ""five hundred (500)" miles" to blank.

Seconded

Bruce Pelz(A): Risks creating nonsense.

Chairman: We could create a hitlist and choose distances.

Kent Bloom (A): "Blank" could cause indirect failure if a distance cannot be agreed.

Alex von Thorn: MOVE to postpone discussion of distances until tomorrow.

Seconded.

Saul Jaffe (A): Main Business Meeting is too long.

Mark Olson (F): Distance is important.

Rick Kovalchik(A): Against preferential ballot.

Kevin Standlee (A): We should nominate distances now, elect tomorrow.

Vote was 23-20 in favour of postponing discussion of distances to Main Business Meeting on Friday.

3.0 Business Passed On from LoneStarCon 2 Continued

3.2 Polishing the Hugos

Robert Sacks: MOVE to consider report of Hugo Polishing Committee at this time.

Seconded and passed.

The Chairman handed the meeting to Don Eastlake.

Tim Illingworth presented the attached report.

Tim Illingworth: MOVE amendment on Section 2.1

No objection, so passed.

Tim Illingworth: MOVE amendment on Section 2.5

No objection, so passed.

Both amendments passed and formed lesser changes to the main motion at this point.

3.4 Mark Protection Committee Clarifications

Robert Sacks raised the point that there were two typing errors in this Item as printed in the Business Passed On handout.

"Non-voting" had been struck from 1.10.1.2 and "3.6" in 1.10.1.2 should read "3.8".

[Secretary: Corrected versions are enclosed.]

6.0 Site Selection Business

6.1 Report of the 2001 Site Selection & Presentation by Winner

6.2 Question Time for Seated Worldcons

6.3 Presentation by bidders for 2002 Worldcon

 

The meeting adjourned at 12:00 in memory of Ross Pavlac.

The World Science Fiction Society

Main Business Meeting at Bucconeer

Friday 7th August 1998, 10:00 AM

Chairman called meeting to order at 10:07 AM. Attendance as recorded on the sign-up sheets for this meeting was 73.

2.0 Worldcon Reports

2.1 Reports of Past Worldcons

2.1.3 Intersection (1995)

The Business Meeting agreed to deal with this item out of order. Intersection’s final financial report was presented by Vince Docherty. A copy is attached.

1.0 Committee Reports

1.1 Mark Protection Committee

Gary Feldbaum was not present to present report. Polling was opened at 10:10 and closed at 10:27. Eventually, Tim Illingworth, Kevin Standlee and Ben Yalow were elected to the Committee.

1.2 The Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee

This Item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

1.3 Worldcon Runners Guide Editorial Committee

This item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

1.4 Extending Dramatic Presentation Eligibility to Entire Seasons

This report was not presented at this time.

Robert Sacks: Point of Inquiry. What happens if report is not presented?

Chairman: The matter dies unless the Business Meeting chooses to do something.

[Secretary: See minutes for later this day.]

2.0 Worldcon Reports

2.1 Reports of Past Worldcons

2.1.1 Magicon (1992) Continued to tomorrow

2.1.2 ConAdian (1994) Continued to tomorrow

2.1.3 Intersection (1995) Final report presented to Main Meeting

2.1.4 L.A.con III (1996) Final report will be attached to minutes

2.1.5 LoneStarCon 2 (1997) Interim report presented to Preliminary

Business Meeting

2.2 Reports of Seated Worldcons and NASFiCs

2.2.1 Bucconeer (1998) Continued to tomorrow

2.2.2 Conucopia (1999 NASFiC) Continued to tomorrow

2.2.3 Aussiecon Three (1999) Interim report presented to Preliminary

Business Meeting

2.2.4 Chicon 2000 (2000) Continued to tomorrow

 

3.0 Business passed on from LoneStarCon 2

3.1 Master in Our Own House

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

Johnny Carruthers (F): This is what we do anyway, so we should formalise it by accepting this motion.

Roger Wells (A): Robert's Rules were written because no-one could agree what Customs & Practices meant.

Robert Sacks (F): Point out the example that there is a member of WSFS present at this meeting who had difficulty voting for physical reasons and we altered our method of voting to allow for this, against Robert's Rules.

Cheryl Morgan (A): Customs and Practices must be written down.

Ben Yalow (F): The Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee are writing down Customs and Practices and past minutes are becoming more widely available.

Don Eastlake (A): The question of customary ways of interpreting Robert's shouldn’t become part of the WSFS Constitution.

Robert Sacks (F): Rulings of continuing effect have no constitutional basis.

Richard Russell (A): Unhappy with phrasing. What about Customs and Practices that are not rulings?

MOVE: To amend Item 3.1 by striking the phrase "the customs and usages of WSFS (including" and ")"

Mark Olson (A): We should be explicit that the will of the assembly overrides Robert's.

18 in favour, 27 Against, motion fails.

Kent Bloom (F): This amendment warns people that we have non-standard Customs and Practices.

Kevin Standlee (A): This is an insidious amendment.

32 in favour, 19 against. This amendment to the WSFS Constitution was ratified in its original form.

3.2 Polishing the Hugos

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

Ben Yalow: Point of Information, Section 3.7 is missing from Business Passed On Handout.

[Secretary: Has been added in version of BPO handout with minutes.]

There were no speakers for or against this motion.

There was no objection to ratification.

This amendment to the WSFS Constitution was ratified.

3.3 Committee Responsibility

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

There were no speakers for or against this motion.

There was no objection to ratification.

This amendment to the WSFS Constitution was ratified.

3.4 Mark Protection Committee Clarifications

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

There were no speakers for or against this motion.

There was no objection to ratification.

This amendment to the WSFS Constitution was ratified.

3.5 Eligibility

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

There were no speakers for or against this motion.

There was no objection to ratification.

This amendment to the WSFS Constitution was ratified.

3.6 Yet More Business

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

There were no speakers for or against this motion.

Vote carried many to one.

This amendment to the WSFS Constitution was ratified.

3.7 Not Just Books

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

Mike Hopkins (F): The film "Apollo 13" was a non-fiction drama presentation and did not fit the current system of Hugo awards.

Ben Yalow (A): Non-fiction is a difficult category already, this amendment will not improve the situation. Instead of just comparing apples and oranges, we’ll be trying to compare apples and purple.

Saul Jaffe (F): A book is a defined object, but this amendment would allow the inclusion of non-book media, such as CD roms.

Lew Wolkoff (A): Word counts are argued about so much that it seems perverse to loosen a category boundary. Also why does this only apply to non-fiction category?

Rick Kovalchik (F): CD roms relate more to non-fiction, we can always amend the other categories later.

Mark Olson (A): Support the concept but not the wording, the wording is flawed.

Don Eastlake (F): Fiction categories are based on wordcount, not media.

George Flynn (A): This is a can of worms, especially with movies.

Robert Sacks: MOVE to extend debate by six minutes. Seconded, 32 in favour, 21 against.

Motion to extend debate fails. [Secretary: Needed 2/3rd majority.]

18 in favour, 32 against this amendment.

The amendment fails and is not ratified.

4.0 New Business Part I

4.1 Petition to extend Susan Matthews’ Campbell Award Eligibility

This Item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

4.2 Short Titles

This Item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

1.0 Committee Reports

1.4 Extending Dramatic Presentation Eligibility to Entire Seasons

Sharon Sbarsky being present reported that the Committee on Extending Dramatic Presentation Eligibility to Entire Seasons had no report to make and did not seek continuance. This matter thus expires.

Robert Sacks: Move to thank committee.

This was seconded and passed.

5.0 New Business Part I

5.1 Proposal to change the designation of the Hugo Awards from "Best" to "Most Popular"

This item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting, where it failed.

5.2 Tidying Site Selection

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

George Flynn: Point of Information: If No-Zone Amendment passes this will have to be amended.

There were no speeches for or against.

This amendment passed many to one, and goes forward to Aussiecon Three to be considered for ratification.

[Secretary: At this time a ten minute recess was called and the meeting was again called to order at 11:05]

 

5.3 No-Zone Rotation

[Secretary: See Attached for full text of amendment]

Chairman: If motion to create a blank instead of 500 miles is passed, I will take nominations as to distance from the floor, and apply a binary search vote so the blank must be filled.

There were no objections to this proposal from the floor.

[Secretary: At this time there were three motions on the floor:

5.3 The original No-Zone Rotation Amendment

5.3.1 An amendment to replace ""five hundred (500)" miles" with a blank.

5.3.2 An amendment to change "five hundred (500)" to "Six hundred (600)".

I apologise for not having minuted who proposed the 600 mile amendment. I have done my best to make the very complicated process of dealing with this amendment clear. At this point we are out of debate time on this amendment.]

Richard Russell: MOVE distance in round number of kilometres, not miles.

Robert Sacks: Seconded.

Chairman ruled this motion out of order.

Alex von Thorn: MOVE to refer to committee. Seconded

Chairman: Ruled this undebateable as main Motion is undebatable.

Alex von Thorn: MOVE to suspend rules to withdraw motion.

Alex von Thorn: MOVE to withdraw motion

Robert Sacks: Objected.

Chairman agreed.

MOTION to make refer to committee debatable fails.

MOTION to refer to committee fails.

[Secretary: Back where we started.]

Richard Russell: Point of inquiry: Why is a motion to have measurement in kilometres out of order?

Chairman: Refer to the agenda. In the motion on the floor, "miles" forms part of the blank. Once we have a distance, motion is in order.

Vote on amendment to replace ""five hundred (500)" miles" with a blank was taken and failed, 23 in favour, 36 against.

[Secretary: The next motion on the agenda was to change "five hundred (500)" to "Six hundred (600)", but:]

Mark Olson: Want to discuss main motion.

Don Eastlake: MOVE to suspend rules and discuss amendments out of order.

.

As there were no objections this was passed.

Chairman ruled there would be ten minutes of debate on main motion.

Ben Yalow (F): Current system is making life very difficult in terms of finding suitable sites, often now have only one strong bid per zone. We don’t now have the problem of the Worldcon potentially staying in one area as no group wants to be stuck continuously with it. The exclusion zone is to prevent local voters controlling the location.

Robert Sacks (A): This is too complicated, drawing circles on a globe and will be perversely applied.

Saul Jaffe (F): Think 500 miles is too small.

Ken Smookler (A): 1. No-one has justified the premise that rotation zone system is broken. 2. Current zone system allows cities without huge and powerful organisations to win. 3. Empty years invite people to bid.

Kent Bloom (F): Current system is broken. Finding suitable facilities and committees for a given year is very difficult. We need to be able to fill in when facilities are available. Bucconeer Labor Day problem is an example of this.

Don Timm (A): Defeats the purpose of expanding groups and interests who want to run a Worldcon - may lead to the domination of a small number of local groups.

Mark Olson: MOVE to extend debate by a further ten minutes. Passed by a 2/3rd majority.

Bruce Pelz (F): Running out of venue / committee combinations. No-Zone rotation will protect a strong bid from a stronger one.

Linda Ross-Mansfield (A): Bucconeer proves Worldcons can move away from Labor Day. This flexibility proves the system isn’t broken.

Mark Olson (F): Fandom likes variety. Being plausible helps smaller bids. Overseas bids will lose their technical advantage, but fans still like voting for overseas bids.

Lew Wolkoff (A): Entered a statement from Tess Wade. [Secretary: As Lew read extracts from this statement I’ve added it verbatim as a footnote.] For himself, Lew felt this was not an appropriate way to fix a broken system.

Louis Epstein (F): Exclusion zone should be smaller.

Richard Russell (A) 1. Why is there an exclusion zone at all? 2. Bucconeer date was decision of voters. 3. Facilities can’t be booked one year in advance.

Michael Pins (F): Exclusion zone should prevent vote packing. Reduced bidding time is a feature not a bug.

Stephen Boucher (A): Shoestring bids such as Aussiecon Three would have difficulty with strong opposition.

Bruce Pelz (F): Committees should run for a bid, not against another bid.

Johnny Carruthers (A): Difficult decision to reverse if we’re wrong.

Victoria Smith (A): Curtailing bidding to three years will diminish numbers of available venues.

Alex von Thorn (A): With six or seven bidding committees, planning will be harder.

[Secretary: The ten minutes of debate on the main motion have elapsed and we return to the motion on amending 500 to 600.]

Mark Olson: MOVE to extend debate time by 15 minutes.

Seconded and passed by 2/3rd majority.

Linda Mansfield (F): Makes more sense for non-East coast bids.

Robert Sacks (A): Large exclusion zone may reduce competition.

Mark Olson (F): Intended to prevent enormous disparity between local and distant bids.

Rick Kovalchik (A): Not considering local fans, 600 miles is too big on East coast.

Don Timm (F): Must have protection against "capturing" Worldcons. Note that the exclusion zones replace the regions.

Alex von Thorn: Point of Information. Intend to move a motion to amend 500 to 400 if this motion is defeated.

The question was moved. Debate closed on the 500 to 600 amendment, which was voted on and failed.

Alex von Thorn: MOVE to amend 500 to 400 miles.

Seconded

Seth Breidbart: MOVE to amend rules so that all motions to amend distances are undebatable.

Seconded and passed by 2/3rd majority.

Lew Wolkoff: MOVE to postpone to next year.

Seconded.

Alex von Thorn (F): Allow consensus building.

Don Timm: Want to see a map. MOVE to refer to committee.

Seconded.

John Lorentz (A): Don’t want to postpone to next year.

Ben Yalow: MOVE to close debate.

Seconded and passed by 2/3rd majority.

Motion to refer to committee fails.

Mark Olson: MOVE to postpone to tomorrow.

Seconded.

Robert Sacks: Discuss situation

Lew Wolsky: Needs Map

Secretary [foolishly] volunteers to prepare map(s).

Debate is closed and motion to postpone to tomorrow passes.

[Secretary: There are now two motions pending:

5.3 The original No-Zone Rotation Amendment

5.3.1 An amendment to change "five hundred (500)" to "four hundred (400)".

5.3.2 An amendment to postpone to next year.]

1.0 Committee Reports

1.1 Mark Protection Committee

The tellers reported the results of the election to the Mark Protection Committee. Elected were Tim Illingworth, Kevin Standlee, Ben Yalow.

6.0 Site Selection Business

6.1 Report of the 2001 Site Selection & Presentation by Winner

6.2 Question Time for Seated Worldcons

6.3 Presentation by bidders for 2002 Worldcon

The World Science Fiction Society

Site Selection Business Meeting at Bucconeer

Saturday 8th August 1998, 10:00 AM

Chairman called meeting to order at 10:10 AM. Attendance as recorded on the sign-up sheets for this meeting was 80. [Secretary: I am aware this does not tally with the results of later voting, which would imply 100 people were present (99 voters plus the Chairman). However if you won’t sign, you won’t sign.]

 

6.0 Site Selection Business

6.1 Report of the 2001 Site Selection & Presentation by Winner

The site selection result was presented, a final copy is attached. The count took 69 minutes and the Philadelphia bid was the clear winner.

Todd Dashoff, a representative of The Millennium Philcon, made a short presentation, and presented PR0. They have not yet decided their representative to the Mark Protection Committee. Todd Dashoff is Chairman, other committee members have not yet been finalised.

6.2 Question Time for Seated Worldcons

Neither Aussiecon Three nor Chicon 2000 had presentations to make. As representatives of both committees are available elsewhere, question time was waived.

1.0 Committee Reports

1.1 Mark Protection Committee

Gary Feldbaum presented the attached Mark Protection Committee minutes.

1.2 The Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee

This Item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

1.3 Worldcon Runners Guide Editorial Committee

This Item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

1.4 Extending Dramatic Presentation Eligibility to Entire Seasons

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

2.0 Worldcon Reports

 

2.1 Reports of Past Worldcons

2.1.1 Magicon (1992) Final report will be attached to minutes

2.1.2 ConAdian (1994) Interim report will be attached to minutes

2.1.3 Intersection (1995) Final report presented to Main Meeting

2.1.4 L.A.con III (1996) Final report will be attached to minutes

2.1.5 LoneStarCon 2 (1997) Interim report presented to Preliminary

Business Meeting

2.2 Reports of Seated Worldcons and NASFiCs

2.2.1 Bucconeer (1998) Interim report presented

2.2.2 Conucopia (1999 NASFiC) No report at this time

2.2.3 Aussiecon Three (1999) Interim report presented to Preliminary

Business Meeting

2.2.4 Chicon 2000 (2000) Not yet available

6.0 Site Selection Business

6.3 Presentation by bidders for 2002 Worldcon

[Secretary: Neither San Francisco nor Seattle had presentations to make. However Kevin Standlee on behalf of San Francisco and Pat Porter on behalf of Seattle answered questions from the floor. That question and answer session is summarised here.]

1. Convention membership rates will be held from Aussiecon Three through end of 1999, as usual.

2. Seattle will take place on traditional dates. San Francisco will run Friday through Tuesday because of a Fancy Foods Convention which uses the convention space but is light on hotel space. Hugos, masquerade, business meetings will be moved to suit.

3. Both conventions are required to use outsourced hotel bureaux, but in both cases the bureaux are experienced and long-standing.

4. San Francisco will hold most daytime activities in the convention centre and most night-time activities in the nearby Marriott hotel, but some events will take place in nearby ANA hotel. Seattle has all activities until midnight in the convention centre. Later activities are in a new hotel connected to the convention centre.

5. In San Francisco there are 24 hour private security for the local area. In Seattle most homeless and panhandlers are not nearby.

6. Seattle’s room block is 800 in Sheraton, 800 in Westin, 100 in Hilton with some smaller local hotels. San Francisco have 1200 of 1500 rooms blocked in the Marriott, 500 of 700 in ANA. There are also three new hotels building nearby.

7. As anywhere else, San Francisco cannot guarantee they won’t lose the Marriott, but their records or 1993, and how much business went elsewhere should help.

8. Room rates for San Francisco and Seattle are pretty much the same $95/$135 +/- 5% for inflation.

9. In San Francisco local hotels have not blocked many rooms for the Fancy Food Convention.

[Secretary: Meeting recessed for ten minutes and was called to order at 10:55.]

3.0 Business passed on from LoneStarCon 2

3.1 Master in Our Own House

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

3.2 Polishing the Hugos

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

3.3 Committee Responsibility

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

3.4 Mark Protection Committee Clarifications

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

3.5 Eligibility

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

3.6 Yet More Business

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

3.7 Not Just Books

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

4.0 New Business Part I

4.1 Petition to extend Susan Matthews’ Campbell Award Eligibility

This Item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

4.2 Short Titles

This Item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

5.0 New Business Part II

5.1 Proposal to change the designation of the Hugo Awards from "Best" to "Most Popular"

This Item was dealt with at the Preliminary Business Meeting

5.2 Tidying Site Selection

This Item was dealt with at the Main Business Meeting

5.3 No-Zone Rotation

Chairman: There will be 30 minutes of debate time. Pending amendments are 500 to 400 miles change and to postpone to next year.

Mark Olson: MOVE to suspend rules for 15 minutes to allow open debate and get all proposals on floor.

Seconded and passed by 2/3rd majority.

[Secretary: This is Quasi-Committee of the Whole in Robert's.]

Ben Yalow: Intend to introduce amendment to the main motion: "No site should be eligible for the ballot if its selection would result in the Worldcon being held in the same continent for more than seven consecutive years."

Robert Sacks: 1. Intend to move kilometres instead of miles. 2. Opposed to Ben’s motion, tampering with voters prerogative.

Rick Kovalchik: Another example why No-Zone rotation is bad.

Alex von Thorn: 400 mile limit will exclude local voters and 500 miles is too large.

Mark Olson: 1. Issue is will restriction improve situation by improving voters’ choice. 2. Not bothered about 400 / 500 / 600

Don Timm: Still unhappy about six sites idea from yesterday. Could we have no city repeating within 10 / 12 / 9 year period.

Louis Epstein: Disqualify city if it had held twice within 12 years.

Mike Kennedy: Concerned with excluding cities based purely on distance - transportation is more complicated than that.

Priscilla Olson: Exclusion by distance is alleviated by No-Zone proposal. Current zones are effectively by larger distances.

Seth Breidbart: Intend to propose amendment to change distance to (2 to the 12) furlongs.

Chairman called for order, as floor chanted "Kill Seth".

Martin Easterbrook: 1. Opposed to Ben Yalow's seven year proposal - forces foreign bids. 2. We can always amend main motion later.

Linda Mansfield: This will lead to tough politics.

Lew Wolkoff: We started with an exclusion for miles, we’ve now added blanks for years and continents therefore I move to postpone no-zone proposal for one year.

Chairman: This will be in order once rules suspension is complete.

Johnny Carruthers: The effect on this years bidding is interesting.

Kent Bloom: In favour of this simpler system. A complicated system is not necessary, apart from local exclusion. Economics and size will control potential repetition problem.

Michael Pins: The potential control of bidding is a good feature.

Richard Russell: This is a two part process, choosing the correct wording and substituting for the current wording. Still don’t believe the current system is broken.

Terry Graybill: Rather this was postponed to next year, not happy about ratification taking place at Aussiecon Three.

[Secretary: Open debate time finished.]

Chairman: Motion on floor is to postpone to next year.

Lew Wolkoff (F): Too complicated, we need time to consider.

Ben Yalow (A): Similar motions in various forms have been debated for five years, why extend argument even further.

Rick Kovalchik (F): Don’t want to waste time in Australia.

Mark Olson: MOVE the question.

Seconded, Passed many to few.

Motion to postpone fails.

Don Timms: Point of Inquiry: Is it in order to vote on the main motion?

The podium staff conferred and the Parliamentarian offered: You could move the motion to adjourn sine die.

Don Timms: So MOVED

Seconded.

43 in favour, 51 against. Motion fails.

Mark Olson: Point of Inquiry: What’s the current situation?

Chairman: There are ten minutes of debate remaining. During the open period there were six foreshadowed motions:

Once in 10 years

Twice in 12 years

Six years on same continent

400/500 miles

2 to the 12 furlongs

Kilometres rather than miles.

Bruce Pelz: Move question on the first.

Seconded.

Johnny Carruthers: Move question on all of them.

Seconded.

The vote was not 2/3rd the motions are not closed.

Robert Sacks: MOVE to allow two minutes per item.

Seconded and passed 2/3rd.

All motions were seconded by Mark Olson.

Once in 10 years

Don Timms (F): Number of years is greater than seven.

Xxx Stalray (A): Motion unnecessary, pattern of voting.

[Secretary: Didn't catch name and they didn't sign up.]

Robert Sacks (A): Let voters choose.

Alex von Thorn (F): Improves new rules.

John Lorentz (A): Really stupid limitation.

Lew Wolkoff (F): Once every nine years is a direct result of rotation system.

Motion fails many to one

Twice in 12 years

MOVE to extend debate to three minutes fails.

Robert Sacks (F): This is almost reasonable.

Ben Yalow (A): Almost.

Louis Epstein (F): Fair restriction, unlikely to breakdown.

Johnny Carruthers (A): Why support this similar result.

Alex von Thorn (F): Relieve concerns.

Richard Russell (A): Metropolitan areas are not well defined.

Lew Wolkoff (F): Metropolitan areas are defined by US Census.

Motion fails many to one.

Only six consecutive years in any one continent

Mark Olson (F): No practical effect. Historically sound.

Rick Kovalchik (A) This forces international bids every seven years.

Stephen Boucher (F): Dead man’s switch, very practical.

Martin Easterbrook (A): Hoax bids could have a very strong card.

Linda Mansfield (A): There might not be a Worldcon if there was no eligible bid.

Motion fails, 32 in favour, 53 against.

400 / 500 miles

Richard Russell (F): 400 miles is better than 500.

Seth Breidbart (A): Brighton to Glasgow is 400 miles.

Motion fails, 27 in favour, 54 against.

2 to the 12 furlongs (512 miles)

Seth Breidbart (F): Round numbers are good.

Robert Sacks (A): Commonly used units are good.

'Zanne Labonville (A): Will require too much explanation.

Kent Bloom (A): It’s fannish, but it’s bloody stupid.

Motion fails many to few.

Kilometres instead of miles

Robert Sacks (F): Kilometres is the legal standard in USA.

Mark Olson (A): It’s frivolous. Zones really matter in USA where everyone knows miles.

KIM Campbell (F): More international, less US-centric.

Doug Faunt: MOVE to list both kilometres and miles.

Seconded

Chairman: 500 miles is almost exactly 800 kms.

Motion adopted by unanimous consent.

[Secretary: I understand that the motion as adopted was to amend ""five hundred (500)" miles" to "five hundred (500) miles or eight hundred (800) kilometres" The difference between the two is roughly three miles or 5 kilometres., with 500 miles equal to 804.7km.]

Vote on main motion, as amended above.

Motion passed with 52 in favour, 47 against. Motion goes forward to Aussiecon Three to be considered for ratification.

Ben Yalow: MOVE to compliment all those who participated in this debate.

Seconded and passed without objection.

Seth Breidbart: Request ruling from the Chairman as to what constitutes a lesser change.

Chairman: That’s Jack Herman’s business, I won’t comment on that.

[Secretary: Jack Herman is Chairman of next year’s Business Meeting.]

Robert Sacks: MOVE to adjourn Sine Die.

Seconded and passed without objection.

Meeting was adjourned at 11:47

 

 

Disposition of Business

Constitutional Amendments Ratified (Second Year Approval)

Business Passed On Items 3.1, 3.2 (as Amended), 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 were ratified and now form part of the WSFS Constitution.

Constitutional Amendments Failed of Ratification

Business Passed On Item 3.7 failed of ratification.

Constitutional Amendments Passed (First Year Approval)

Proposed Constitutional Amendments 5.2 and 5.3 passed, and now go forward to Aussiecon Three to be considered for ratification.

New Business Item 4.2 also passed, and does not require ratification.

Constitutional Amendments Defeated

Proposed Constitutional Amendment 5.1 was defeated by Object to Consideration.

Standing Rules Changes

There were no standing rules changes.

Other Items On Agenda

The following special committees were continued:

Nitpicking and Flyspecking Committee (1.2)

Worldcon Runners' Guide Editorial Committee (1.3)

The following special committees were discharged or otherwise not continued:

Hugo Polishing Committee (3.2)

The Petition to Extend Susan Matthews' Campbell Award Eligibility was passed.

Outline Agenda for 1999

1. Committee Reports

1.1 Mark Protection Committee

1.2 Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee

1.3 Worldcon Runners Guide Editorial Committee

2. Worldcon Reports

2.1 Past Worldcons and NASFiCs

2.1.1 ConAdian (1994)

2.1.2 L.A.con III (1996)

2.1.3 LoneStarCon 2 (1997)

2.1.4 Bucconeer (1998)

2.1.5 Conucopia (1999 NASFiC)

2.2 Seated Worldcons

2.2.1 Aussiecon Three (1999)

2.2.2 Chicon 2000 (2000)

2.2.3 The Millennium Philcon (2001)

3. Business Passed On from Bucconeer

` 3.1 Tidying Site Selection

3.2 No-Zone Rotation

4. New Business

5. Site Selection Business

5.1 Report of the 2002 Site Selection & Presentation by Winners

5.2 Reports by seated Worldcons

5.3 Presentation by bidders for 2003

Appendices

A Preliminary Business Meeting Agenda

B Main Business Meeting Agenda

C Site Selection Business Meeting Agenda

D Handout: Business Passed On from LoneStarCon II

E Handout: New Motions

F Attendance List

G Committee Report: Polishing the Hugos

H Financial Report: Mark Protection Committee

I Worldcon Site Selection Results - Final *

J US Map with 250 & 500 mile circles *

K Mileage Charts (2 sheets)

L WSFS Constitution, with amendments ratified at Bucconeer

M Business Passed On to Aussiecon Three

N Proposed Agenda for Aussiecon Three

O The Millennium Philcon PR0

P Financial Report: Magicon

Q Financial Report: ConAdian

R Financial Report: Intersection

S Financial Report: L.A.con III

T Financial Report: LoneStarCon 2

U Financial Report: Bucconeer

V Financial Report: Aussiecon Three

 

 

APPENDIX A - Preliminary Business Meeting Agenda

The World Science Fiction Society

Preliminary Business Meeting at Bucconeer

Thursday 6 August 1998

10:00 am

0. Point of Privilege

0.1 Point of Privilege on the Rights of the Assembly, raised by Robert Sacks

That last year's Business Meeting Secretary changed newly adopted Standing Rule 13 from "agendized" to "main" which was a substantive change (improving the wording by eliminating a hole). Substantive changes to the Standing Rules by the Secretary are prohibited by Standing Rule 23. I therefore move on a point of privilege to ratify the change.

Ruling by the Chair of the Business Meeting

I rule that this point is Not Well Taken, for the following reasons:

(1) In the context of the WSFS Business Meeting, the change is not substantive. All main motions coming before the meeting are on the agenda, and thus are agendized, whether or not they appear on the printed agenda, and any subsidiary motions appearing on the printed agenda derive their times from the main motions to which they adhere, and

(2) the customs and practices of WSFS allow for such changes by the Secretary.

1. Committee Reports

1. 1. Mark Protection Committee (and Nominations for MPC)

See the World Science Fiction Society Constitution, Sections 4.4 and 4.5, and Standing Rule 12.

Officers: Randall Shepherd (Chairman), Scott Dennis (Treasurer), Gary Keith Feldbaum (Secretary).

Membership: elected until Bucconeer: Tim Illingworth, Kevin Standlee, Ben Yalow; elected until Aussiecon Three: Stephen Boucher, Gary Keith Feldbaum, Sue Francis; elected until Chicon 2000: Scott Dennis, Donald Eastlake, Ruth Sachter; Worldcon appointees: Robert Sacks (L.A.con 111), Randall Shepherd (LoneStarCon 2), Covert Beach (Bucconeer), Dick Smith (Aussiecon Three), 'Zanne Labonville (Chicon 2000); NASFIC appointee: Robert Sacks (Conucopia).

Postal address: P.O. Box 426159, Kendall Square Station, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA.

E-mail: mpc@wsfs.org

1.2. Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee

The 1986 WSFS Business Meeting voted to create a special committee to research and codify all resolutions of the WSFS Business Meeting that are still in force. This committee has submitted reports to Business Meetings since 1987, and has each year been continued to report to the next Business Meeting.

Membership: Donald E. Eastlake, III (Chairman), Tim Illingworth, Kevin Standlee.

Postal address: 318 Acton St., Carlisle, MA 01741, USA.

E-mail: dee3@torque.pothole.com

1.3. Worldcon Runners' Guide Editorial Committee

This committee was established by the 1989 WSFS Business Meeting, and has been continued ever since. A new edition of the Worldcon Runners' Guide was submitted at the 1996 Business Meeting.

 

1.4. Extending Dramatic Presentation Eligibility to Entire Seasons

The 1995 WSFS Business Meeting considered the following motion:

MOVED, to amend Sec. 2.2.6 of the WSFS Constitution by replacing the second sentence with:

"In the case of individual programs presented as a series, any of the following may be eligible: (a) a single program; (b) a sequence of instalments constituting a single dramatic unit; (c) an entire season considered as a whole. In cases (b) and (c), eligibility shall be in the year of the final instalment or program. Once a sequence of programs (including an entire season) has appeared on a final Hugo ballot as a collective nominee, no collective nominee including that sequence or any part thereof shall be eligible in any subsequent year. If two or more overlapping sequences are nominated in the same year, only the one with the most votes shall appear on the final ballot."

Questions having arisen as to the interpretation of such terms as "program", "season" and "production", it was voted to refer the motion for clarification to a committee directed to report at the 1996 Business Meeting; the committee failed to report, and was continued to the 1997 Business Meeting, where it was continued to the 1998 Business Meeting. (The committee may also consider other motions on the same subject.) The committee may be contacted through Sharon Sbarsky, P.O. Box 453, Needham, MA 02194, USA; e-mail at sbarsky@world.std.com

2. Worldcon Reports

2.1. Past Worldcons

2.1.1. Magicon (1992)

2.1.2. ConAdian (1994)

2.1.3. Intersection (1995)

2.1.4. L.A.con Ill (1996)

2.1.5. LoneStarCon 2 (1997)

2.2. Reports of Seated Worldcons and NASFiCs

2.2.1. Bucconeer (1998)

2.2.2. Conucopia (1999 NASFIC)

2.2.3. Aussiecon Three (1999 Worldcon)

2.2.4. Chicon 2000 (2000)

3. Business Passed On from LoneStarCon 2

Items under this heading have been given first passage, and will become part of the Constitution if ratified at Bucconeer. Because most of the motions are large, the text of the motions is in the business passed on handout.

3.1. Master in Our Own House

3.2. Polishing the Hugos (including Report of the Hugo Polishing Committee)

3.3. Committee Responsibility

3.4. Mark Protection Committee Clarifications

3.5. Eligibility

3.6. Yet More Business

3.7. Not Just Books

4. New Business Part I

Items under this heading have not been given first passage, but do not require ratification at Aussiecon Three. The text of the motions is in the new business handout.

4.1 Petition to extend Susan Matthews' Campbell Award Eligibility

4.2 Short Titles

5. New Business Part 11

Items under this heading have not been given first passage, and will become part of the Constitution only if ratified at Bucconeer and at Aussiecon Three. Because most of the motions are large, the text of the motions is in the new business handout.

5.1 Proposal to change the designation of the Hugo Awards from "Best" to "Most Popular"

5.2 Tidying Site Selection

5.3 No-Zone Rotation

6. Site-Selection Business

6.1. Report of the 2001 Site Selection and Presentation by Winner

6.2. Presentation by Bidders for 2002 Worldcon (time permitting)

 

 

 

APPENDIX B - Main Business Meeting Agenda

The World Science Fiction Society

Main Business Meeting at Bucconeer

Friday 7 August 1998

10:00 am

1. Committee Reports

1. 1. Mark Protection Committee (and Elections for MPC)

See the World Science Fiction Society Constitution, Sections 4.4 and 4.5, and Standing Rule 12. There are three vacancies on the Committee. The nominees for this year's elections are:

Tim Illingworth (Overseas), Randall Shepherd (Central), Ken Smookler (Central), Kevin Standlee (Western) and Ben Yalow (Eastern). Only one candidate from the Central zone can be elected; any of the others may be elected.

1. 2. Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee

This committee reported to the Preliminary Business Meeting.

1.3. Worldcon Runners' Guide Editorial Committee

This committee was established by the 1989 WSFS Business Meeting, and has been continued ever since. The Preliminary Business Meeting appointed Saul Jaffe to continue the work of the committee. Mr. Jaffe is to appoint at least two other members to the committee, and is to arrange for mirror sites for committee documents. The Committee's email address is: crg@sflovers.rutgers.edu.

1.4 Extending Dramatic Presentation Eligibility to Entire Seasons

The 1995 WSFS Business Meeting considered the following motion:

MOVED, to amend Sec. 2.2.6 of the WSFS Constitution by replacing the second sentence with: " In the case of individual programs presented as a series, any of the following may be eligible: (a) a single program; (b) a sequence of instalments constituting a single dramatic unit; (c) an entire season considered as a whole. In cases (b) and (c), eligibility shall be in the year of the final instalment or program. Once a sequence of programs (including an entire season) has appeared on a final Hugo ballot as a collective nominee, no collective nominee including that sequence or any part thereof shall be eligible in any subsequent year. If two or more overlapping sequences are nominated in the same year, only the one with the most votes shall appear on the final ballot."

Questions having arisen as to the interpretation of such terms as "program", "season" and "production", it was voted to refer the motion for clarification to a committee directed to report at the 1996 Business Meeting; the committee failed to report, and was continued to the 1997 Business Meeting, where it was continued to the 1998 Business Meeting. (The committee may also consider other motions on the same subject.) The committee may be contacted through Sharon Sbarsky, P.O. Box 453, Needham, MA 02194, USA; e-mail at sbarsky@world.std.com

2. Worldcon Reports

2.1. Past Worldcons

2.1.1 Magicon (1992)

2.1.2. ConAdian (1994)

2.1.3. Intersection (1995)

2.1.4. L.A.con Ill (1996)

2.1.5. LoneStarCon 2 (1997) [presented at the Preliminary Business Meeting]

2.2. Reports of Seated Worldcons and NASFiCs

2.2.1. Bucconeer (1998)

2.2.2. Conucopia (1999 NASFIC)

2.2.3. Aussiecon Three (1999 Worldcon) [presented at the Preliminary Business Meeting]

2.2.4. Chicon 2000 (2000)

3. Business Passed On from LoneStarCon 2

Items under this heading have been given first passage, and will become part of the Constitution if ratified at Bucconeer. Because most of the motions are large, the text of the motions is in the Business Passed On handout.

3. 1. Master in Our Own House (6 minutes debate time allowed)

3.2. Polishing the Hugos (6 minutes debate time allowed)

This was amended at the Preliminary Business Meeting: Section 2.2 now reads:

Section 2.2: General.

2.2.1: Unless otherwise specified, Hugo Awards are given for work in the field of science fiction or fantasy appearing for the first time during the previous calendar year.

2.2.2: A work originally appearing in a language other than English shall also be eligible for the year in which it is first issued in English translation. A work, once it has appeared in English, may thus be eligible only once.

2.2.3: Publication date, or cover date in the case of a dated periodical, takes precedence over copyright date.

2.2.4: Works appearing in a series are eligible as individual works, but the series as a whole is not eligible. However, a work appearing in a number of parts shall be eligible for the year of the final part.

2.2.5: In the written fiction categories, an author may withdraw a version of a work from consideration if the author feels that the version is not representative of what that author wrote.

2.2.6: The Worldcon Committee may relocate a story into a more appropriate category if it feels that it is necessary, provided that the length of the story is within the lesser of five thousand (5,000) words or twenty percent (20%) of the new category limits.

2.2.7: The Worldcon Committee is responsible for all matters concerning the Awards.

3.3 Committee Responsibility (6 minutes debate time allowed)

3.4 Mark Protection Committee Clarifications (6 minutes debate time allowed)

3.5 Eligibility (6 minutes debate time allowed)

3.6 Yet More Business (6 minutes debate time allowed)

3.7 Not Just Books (6 minutes debate time allowed)

4. New Business Part I

Items under this heading have not been given first passage, but do not require ratification at Aussiecon Three. The text of the motions is in the new business handout.

4.1 Petition to extend Susan Matthews' Campbell Award Eligibility

[This resolution was adopted by the Preliminary Business Meeting.]

4.2 Short Titles [This resolution was adopted by the Preliminary Business Meeting.]

5. New Business Part 11

Items under this heading have not been given first passage, and will become part of the Constitution only if ratified at Bucconeer and at Aussiecon Three. Because most of the motions are large, the text of the motions is in the new business handout.

5.1 Proposal to change the designation of the Hugo Awards from "Best" to "Most Popular"

[This resolution was removed from the Agenda by "Object to Consideration"]

5.2 Tidying Site Selection (6 minutes debate time allowed)

5.3 No-Zone Rotation (30 minutes debate time allowed)

Consideration of this motion was postponed to the Main Business Meeting by the Preliminary Business Meeting with a motion pending to create a blank in place of ""five hundred (500)" miles".

6. Site-Selection Business

6.1 Report of the 2001 Site Selection and Presentation by Winner

6.2 Presentation by Bidders for 2003 Worldcon (time permitting)

 

 

 

APPENDIX C - Site Selection Business Meeting Agenda

The World Science Fiction Society

Site Selection Business Meeting at Bucconeer

Saturday 8 August 1998

10:00 am

1. Committee Reports

1.1 Mark Protection Committee (and Result of Elections for MPC)

See the World Science Fiction Society Constitution, Sections 4.4 and 4.5, and Standing Rule 12. Mark Protection Committee report is still awaited. Tim Illingworth, Kevin Standlee and Ben Yalow were elected to the Mark Protection Committee vacancies.

1.2. Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee

This committee reported to the Preliminary Business Meeting.

1.3. Worldcon Runners' Guide Editorial Committee

This business was disposed of at the Preliminary Business Meeting.

1.4. Extending Dramatic Presentation Eligibility to Entire Seasons

This business was disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.

2. Worldcon Reports

2.1. Past Worldcons

2.1.1 Magicon (1992)

2.1.2 ConAdian (1994)

2.1.3 Intersection (1995) [Final financial report was presented to the Main Business Meeting]

2.1.4 L.A.con 111 (1996) [Current financial report will be attached to the minutes of this meeting.]

2.1.5 LoneStarCon 2 (1997) [Current financial report presented to the Preliminary Business Meeting]

2.2. Reports of Seated Worldcons and NASFiCs

2.1.1 Bucconeer (1998)

2.2.2 Conucopia (1999 NASFIC) [Conucopia declined to report at this time.]

2.2.3 Aussiecon Three (1999 Worldcon) [Current financial report presented to the Preliminary Business Meeting]

2.2.4 Chicon 2000 (2000)

3. Business Passed On from LoneStarCon 2

3.1 Master in Our Own House [Business disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.]

3.2 Polishing the Hugos [Business disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.]

3.3 Committee Responsibility [Business disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.]

3.4 Mark Protection Committee Clarifications [Business disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.]

3.5 Eligibility [Business disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.]

3.6 Yet More Business [Business disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.]

3.7 Not Just Books [Business disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.]

4. New Business Part I

4.1 Petition to extend Susan Matthews' Campbell Award Eligibility

[This resolution was adopted by the Preliminary Business Meeting.]

4.2 Short Titles [This resolution was adopted by the Preliminary Business Meeting.]

5. New Business Part II

5.1 Proposal to change the designation of the Hugo Awards from "Best" to "Most Popular"

[This resolution was removed from the Agenda by "Object to Consideration"]

5.2 Tidying Site Selection [Business disposed of at the Main Business Meeting.]

5.3 No-Zone Rotation (30 minutes debate time allowed; text on the reverse of this Agenda) Consideration of this motion was postponed to the Site Selection Business Meeting by the Main Business Meeting with a motion pending to put "four hundred (400)" instead of "five hundred (500)".

It is the Chair's intention to take up Item 5.3 after Item 6.2 (Question Time for Seated Worldcons), and before Item 6.3 (Presentation by Bidders for 2002 Worldcon.)

6. Site-Selection Business

6.1 Report of the 2001 Site Selection and Presentation by Winner

6.2 Question Time for Seated Worldcons

6.3 Presentation by Bidders for 2002 Worldcon (time permitting)

 

 

 

APPENDIX D - Business Passed On From LoneStarCon II

The World Science Fiction Society

Business Passed On To Bucconeer

Text of Constitutional Amendments Passed On

Text to be inserted is shown as underlined; text to be deleted is in strikethrough

3.1. Master in Our Own House

MOVED, to amend the WSFS Constitution as follows:

Section 4.1: ... Meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of (in descending order of precedence) the WSFS Constitution; the Standing Rules; such other rules as may be published in advance by the current Committee (which rules may be suspended by the Business Meeting by the same procedure as a Standing Rule); the customs and usages of WSFS (including the resolutions and rulings of continuing effect); and Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised....

Sponsors' argument: It has been asserted that Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised takes precedence over the customs of the Society. The Standing Rules Working Group has debated whether the Society usages on friendly amendment, objection to consideration, the taking and correcting of minutes, and the independence of Worldcon Committees are correct under the parliamentary authority. It is time to decide who is to be the Master and who the Servant.

3.2. Polishing the Hugos

MOVED, to amend the WSFS Constitution by striking out Article II and inserting the following:

Article II - Hugo Awards

Section 2.1: Introduction. Selection of the Hugo Awards shall be made as provided in this Article.

Section 2.2: General.

2.2.1: Unless otherwise specified, Hugo Awards are given in the various categories for work in the field of science fiction or fantasy appearing for the first time during the previous calendar year.

2.2.2: A work originally appearing in a language other than English shall also be eligible for the year in which it is first issued in English translation. A work, once it has appeared in English, may thus be eligible only once.

2.2.3: Publication date, or cover date in the case of a dated periodical, takes precedence over copyright date.

2.2.4: Works appearing in a series are eligible as individual works, but the series as a whole is not eligible. However, a work appearing in a number of parts shall be eligible for the year of the final part.

2.2.5: An author may withdraw a version of a work from consideration if the author feels that the version is not representative of what that author wrote.

2.2.6: The Worldcon Committee may relocate a story into a more appropriate category if it feels that it is necessary, provided that the length of the story is within the lesser of five thousand (5,000) words or twenty percent (20%) of the new category limits.

2.2.7: The Worldcon Committee is responsible for all matters concerning the Awards.

Section 2.3: Categories.

2.3.1: Best Novel. A science fiction or fantasy story of forty thousand (40,000) words or more.

2.3.2: Best Novella. A science fiction or fantasy story of between seventeen thousand five hundred (17,500) and forty thousand (40,000) words.

2.3.3: Best Novelette. A science fiction or fantasy story of between seven thousand five hundred (7,500) and seventeen thousand five hundred (1 7,500) words.

2.3.4: Best Short Story. A science fiction or fantasy story of less than seven thousand five hundred (7,500) words.

2.3.5: Best Related Book. Any work whose subject is related to the field of science fiction, fantasy, or random, appearing for the first time in book form during the previous calendar year, and which is either non-fiction or, if fictional, is noteworthy primarily for aspects other than the fictional text.

2.3.6: Best Dramatic Presentation. Any production in any medium of dramatized science fiction, fantasy or related subjects which has been publicly presented for the first time in its present dramatic form during the previous calendar year.

2.3.7: Best Professional Editor. The editor of any professional publication devoted primarily to science fiction or fantasy during the previous calendar year. A professional publication is one which had an average press run of at least ten thousand (10,000) copies per issue.

2.3.8: Best Professional Artist. An illustrator whose work has appeared in a professional publication in the field of science fiction or fantasy during the previous calendar year.

2.3.9: Best Semiprozine. Any generally available non-professional publication devoted to science fiction or fantasy which by the close of the previous calendar year has published four (4) or more issues, at least one (1) of which appeared in the previous calendar year, and which in the previous calendar year met at least two (2) of the following criteria:

1: had an average press run of at least one thousand (1000) copies per issue,

2: paid its contributors and/or staff in other than copies of the publication,

3: provided at least half the income of any one person,

4: had at least fifteen percent (15%) of its total space occupied by advertising,

5: announced itself to be a semiprozine.

2.3.10: Best Fanzine. Any generally available non-professional publication devoted to science fiction, fantasy, or related subjects which by the close of the previous calendar year has published four (4) or more issues, at least one (1) of which appeared in the previous calendar year, and which does not qualify as a semiprozine.

2.3.11: Best Fan Writer. Any person whose writing has appeared in semiprozines or fanzines or in generally available electronic media during the previous calendar year.

2.3.12: Best Fan Artist. An artist or cartoonist whose work has appeared through publication in semiprozines or fanzines or through other public display during the previous calendar year. Any person whose name appears on the final Hugo Awards ballot for a given year under the Professional Artist category shall not be eligible in the Fan Artist category for that year.

2.3.13: Additional Category. Not more than one special category may be created by the current Worldcon Committee with nomination and voting to be the same as for the permanent categories. The Worldcon Committee is not required to create any such category; such action by a Worldcon Committee should be under exceptional circumstances only; and the special category created by one Worldcon Committee shall not be binding on following Committees. Awards created under this paragraph shall be considered to be Hugo Awards.

Section 2.4: Extended Eligibility. In the event that a potential Hugo Award nominee receives extremely limited distribution in the year of its first publication or presentation, its eligibility may be extended for an additional year by a three fourths (3/4) vote of the intervening Business Meeting of WSFS.

Section 2.5: Name and Design. The Hugo Award shall continue to be standardized on the rocket ship design of Jack McKnight and Ben Jason. Each Worldcon Committee may select its own choice of base design. The name (Hugo Award) and the design shall not be extended to any other award.

Section 2.6: "No Award". At the discretion of an individual Worldcon Committee, if the lack of nominations or final votes in a specific category shows a marked lack of interest in that category on the part of the voters, the Award in that category shall be canceled for that year.

Section 2.7: Nominations.

2.7.1: The Worldcon Committee shall conduct a poll to select the nominees for the final Award voting. Each member of either the administering or the immediately preceding Worldcon as of January 31 of the current calendar year shall be allowed to make up to five (5) equally weighted nominations in every category.

2.7.2: The Committee shall include with each nomination ballot a copy of Article II of the WSFS Constitution.

2.7.3: Nominations shall be solicited only for the Hugo Awards and the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer.

Section 2.8: Tallying of Nominations.

2.8.1: Except as provided below, the final Award ballots shall list in each category the five eligible nominees receiving the most nominations. If there is a tie including fifth place, all the tied eligible nominees shall be listed.

2.8.2: The Worldcon Committee shall determine the eligibility of nominees and assignment to the proper category of nominees nominated in more than one category.

2.8.3: Any nominations for "No Award" shall be disregarded.

2.8.4: If a nominee appears on a nomination ballot more than once in any one category, only one nomination

shall be counted in that category.

2.8.5: No nominee shall appear on the final Award ballot if it received fewer nominations than five percent (5%) of the number of ballots listing one or more nominations in that category, except that the first three eligible nominees, including any ties, shall always be listed.

Section 2.9: Notification and Acceptance. Worldcon Committees shall use reasonable efforts to notify the nominees, or in the case of deceased or incapacitated persons, their heirs, assigns, or legal guardians, in each category prior to the release of such information. Each nominee shall be asked at that time to either accept or decline the nomination. If the nominee declines nomination, that nominee shall not appear on the final ballot.

Section 2.10: Voting.

2.10.1: Final Award voting shall be by mail, with ballots sent only to WSFS members. Final Award ballots shall include name, signature, address, and membership-number spaces to be filled in by the voter.

2.10.2: Final Award ballots shall list only the Hugo Awards and the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer.

2.10.3: "No Award" shall be listed in each category of Hugo Award on the final ballot.

2.10.4: The Committee shall, on or with the final ballot, designate, for each nominee in the printed fiction categories, one or more books, anthologies, or magazines in which the nominee appeared (including the book publisher or magazine issue date(s)).

2.10.5: Voters shall indicate the order of their preference for the nominees in each category.

Section 2.11: Tallying of Votes.

2.11.1: In each category, votes shall first be tallied by the voter's first choices. If no majority is then obtained, the nominee who places last in the initial tallying shall be eliminated and the ballots listing it as first choice shall be redistributed on the basis of those ballots' second choices. This process shall be repeated until a majority-vote winner is obtained.

2.11.2: No Award shall be given whenever the total number of valid ballots cast for a specific category (excluding those cast for "No Award" in first place) is less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total number of final Award ballots received.

2.11.3: After a tentative winner is determined, then unless "No Award" shall be the winner, the following additional test shall be made. If the number of ballots preferring "No Award" to the tentative winner is greater than the number of ballots preferring the tentative winner to "No Award", then "No Award" shall be declared the winner of the election.

2.11.4: The complete numerical vote totals, including all preliminary tallies for first, second, ... places, shall be made public by the Worldcon Committee within ninety (90) days after the Worldcon. During the same period the nomination voting totals shall also be published, including in each category the vote counts for at least the fifteen highest vote-getters and any other candidate receiving a number of votes equal to at least five percent (5%) of the nomination ballots cast in that category.

Section 2.12: Exclusions. No member of the current Worldcon Committee nor any publications closely connected with a member of the Committee shall be eligible for an Award. However, should the Committee delegate all authority under this Article to a Subcommittee whose decisions are irrevocable by the Worldcon Committee, then this exclusion shall apply to members of the Subcommittee only.

Section 2.13: Retrospective Hugos. A Worldcon held 50, 75, or 100 years after a Worldcon at which no Hugos were presented may conduct nominations and elections for Hugos which would have been presented at that previous Worldcon. Procedures shall be as for the current Hugos. Categories receiving insufficient numbers of nominations may be dropped. Once retrospective Hugos have been awarded for a Worldcon, no other Worldcon shall present retrospective Hugos for that Worldcon.

Sponsors' argument: This amendment tidies up the wording of the Hugo Awards somewhat. It takes the general list of principles now in the Best Novel definition and creates a new section from them, with the statement of general responsibility added and a new definition of the eligibility of series constructed from the old versions. As far as we can tell, the only effect is to extend the double eligibility of non-English works to all Hugos instead of just the written fiction categories. The author has tidied up Sections 2.6 to 2.11: it is the sponsors' belief that they now reflect what is intended by the current wording.

Hugo Polishing Committee

A committee consisting of Tim Illingworth and such other persons as he may choose to include was appointed to review potential ambiguities in the wording of the above constitutional amendment. This committee is expected to report its findings before the discussion of ratification of this amendment.

Postal address: 63 Drake Rd, Chessington, Surrey, KT9 I LQ, Great Britain. E-mail: hugocomm@smofdemon.co.uk

3.3. Committee Responsibility

MOVED, to amend the WSFS Constitution by striking out Sections 1.4 (second sentence), 1.5.5, 1.7, 1.8, 3.10, 3.11, 4.2 and 5.6, and inserting the following new Article between Articles 1 and 2: [Text in brackets, including this text, is explanatory and not substantive.]

Article A - Powers and Duties of Worldcon Committees

Section A. 1: Duties. Each Worldcon Committee shall, in accordance with this Constitution, provide for

1: administering the Hugo Awards,

2: administering any future Worldcon or NASFIC site selection required, and

3: holding a WSFS Business Meeting. [New text]

Section A.2: Marks. Every Worldcon and NASFIC Committee shall include the following notice in each of its publications:

"World Science Fiction Society", "WSFS", "World Science Fiction Convention", "Worldcon", "NASFiC", and "Hugo Award" are service marks of the World Science Fiction Society, an unincorporated literary society. [Old Section 1.7, with a reference to NASFiCs added]

Section A.3: Official Representative. Each future selected Worldcon Committee shall designate an official representative to the Business Meeting to answer questions about their Worldcon. [Old Section 4.2, unchanged]

Section A.4: Distribution of Rules. The current Worldcon Committee shall print copies of the WSFS Constitution, together with an explanation of proposed changes approved but not yet ratified, and copies of the Standing Rules. The Committee shall distribute these documents to all WSFS members at a point between nine and three months prior to the Worldcon, and shall also distribute them to all WSFS members in attendance at the Worldcon upon registration. [Old Section 5.6, reworded]

Section A.5: Bid Presentations. Each Worldcon Committee shall provide a reasonable opportunity for bona fide bidding committees for the Worldcon to be selected the following year to make presentations. [Old Section 3.9, slightly reworded]

Section A.6: Incapacity of Committees. With sites being selected three (3) years in advance, there are at least three selected current or future Worldcon Committees at all times. If one of these should be unable to perform its duties, the other selected current or future Worldcon Committee whose site is closer to the site of the one unable to perform its duties shall determine what action to take, by consulting the Business Meeting or by mail poll of WSFS if there is sufficient time, or by decision of the Committee if there is not sufficient time. [Old Section 3. 1 0, with "closest" corrected to "closer"]

Section A.7: Membership Pass-along. Within ninety (90) days after a Worldcon, the administering Committee shall, except where prohibited by local law, forward its best information as to the names and postal addresses of all of its Worldcon members to the Committee of the next Worldcon. [Old Section 1.4 (second sentence), unchanged]

Section A.8: Financial Openness. Any member of WSFS shall have the right, under reasonable conditions, to examine the financial records and books of account of the current Worldcon Committee, all future selected Worldcon Committees, and the two immediately preceding Worldcon Committees. [Old Section 1. 5.5/1.8.2, unchanged]

Section A.9: Financial Reports.

A.9.1: Each future selected Worldcon Committee shall submit an annual financial report, including a statement of income and expenses, to each WSFS Business Meeting after the Committee's selection.

A.9.2: Each Worldcon Committee shall submit a report on its cumulative surplus/loss at the next Business Meeting after its Worldcon.

A.9.3: Each Worldcon Committee should dispose of surplus funds remaining after accounts are settled for the current Worldcon for the benefit of WSFS as a whole.

A.9.4: In the event of a surplus, the Worldcon Committee, or any alternative organizational entity established to oversee and disburse that surplus, shall file annual financial reports regarding the disbursement of that surplus at each year's Business Meeting, until the surplus is totally expended or an amount equal to the original surplus has been disbursed. [Old Section 1. 811.8. 1, reworded]

Sponsors' argument: In the Constitution, a lot of text has grown up defining what Committees may, may not, and should do. This gathers all that text into one place, and breaks up some of the more unwieldy paragraphs for greater readability. The only new text is Section A.1, which defines what a lot of us believe anyway, plus the words "future selected" in A.9.1. Section 5.6 has been reworded from passive to active voice.

3.4. Mark Protection Committee Clarifications

MOVED: to amend the WSFS Constitution by striking out Sections 4.4 and 4.5, and inserting the following in Article I:

Section 1.9: The Mark Protection Committee.

1.9.1: There shall be a Mark Protection Committee of WSFS, which shall be responsible for registration and protection of the marks used by or under the authority of WSFS.

1.9.2: The Mark Protection Committee shall submit to the Business Meeting at each Worldcon a report of its activities since the previous Worldcon, including a statement of income and expense.

1.9.3: The Mark Protection Committee shall hold a meeting at each Worldcon after the end of the Business Meeting, at a time and place announced at the Business Meeting.

1.9.4: The Mark Protection Committee shall determine and elect its own officers.

Section 1.10: Membership of the Mark Protection Committee.

1.10.1: The Mark Protection Committee shall consist of:

1: one (1) member appointed to serve at the pleasure of each future selected Worldcon Committee and each of the two (2) immediately preceding Worldcon Committees

2: one (1) member appointed to serve at the pleasure of each future selected NASFiC Committee and for each Committee of a NASFIC held in the previous two years, and

3: nine (9) members elected three (3) each year to staggered three-year terms by the Business Meeting.

1.10.2: No more than three elected members may represent any single North American region, as defined in Section 3.8. Each elected member shall represent the region (if any) in which the member resided at the time they were elected.

1.10.3: Newly elected members take their seats, and the term of office ends for elected and appointed members whose terms expire that year, at the end of the Business Meeting.

1.10.4: If vacancies occur in elected memberships in the Committee, the remainder of the position's term may be filled by the Business Meeting, and until then temporarily filled by the Committee.

Sponsors' argument: This motion makes no substantive changes. It moves the definitions from the Business Meeting Article to the WSFS Article and improves the readability. Section 1.10.2 is substantially rewritten.

3.5. Eligibility

MOVED, to amend the WSFS Constitution by striking out Section 3.6 and inserting the following:

Section 3.6: Bid Eligibility.

3.6.1: To be eligible for site selection, a bidding committee must file the following documents with the Committee that will administer the voting:

(1) an announcement of intent to bid;

(2) adequate evidence of an agreement with its proposed site's facilities, such as a conditional contract or a letter of agreement;

(3) the rules under which the Worldcon Committee will operate, including a specification of the term of office of their chief executive officer or officers and the conditions and procedures for the selection and replacement of such officer or officers.

3.6.2: The bidding committee must supply written copies of these documents to any member of WSFS on request.

3.6.3: For a bid to be allowed on the printed ballot, the bidding committee must file the documents specified above no later than 180 days prior to the official opening of the administering convention.

3.6.4: To be eligible as a write-in, the bidding committee must file the documents specified above by the close of the voting.

3.6.5: If no bids meet these qualifications, the selection shall proceed as though "None of the Above" had won.

Sponsors' argument: This motion makes no changes to practice. It improves the readability of the Section. It requires the announcement of intent to bid to be written.

3.6. Yet More Business

MOVED, to amend the WSFS Constitution by striking out Sections 4.1, 4.3 and 5.5, and inserting the following:

Article IV - Powers of the Business Meeting

Section 4.1: WSFS Business Meetings.

4.1.1: Business Meetings of WSFS shall be held at advertised times at each Worldcon.

4.1.2: The current Worldcon Committee shall provide the Presiding Officer and Staff for each Meeting.

4.1.3: The Business Meeting may adopt Standing Rules for its own governance.

4.1.4: Meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of (in descending order of precedence) the WSFS Constitution; the Standing Rules; such other rules as may be published in advance by the current Committee (which rules may be suspended by the Business Meeting by the same procedure as a Standing Rule); and the current edition of Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised.

4.1.5: The quorum for the Business Meeting shall be twelve members of the Society physically present.

Section 4.2: Continuation of Committees. Except as otherwise provided in this Constitution, any committee or other position created by a Business Meeting shall lapse at the end of the next following Business Meeting that does not vote to continue it.

Section 4.3: Constitutional Pass-along. Within two (2) months after the end of each Worldcon, the Business Meeting staff shall send a copy of all changes to the Constitution and Standing Rules, and all items awaiting ratification, to the next Worldcon Committee.

Sponsors' argument: This, again, makes no change to current practice. It gathers the remaining references to the Business Meeting into one Article and breaks up the text of section 4.1 for readability.

 

3.7. Not Just Books

MOVED, to amend Section 2.2.5 of the WSFS Constitution as follows:

2.2.5: Best Related Book Work. Any work whose subject is related to the field of science fiction, fantasy, or random, appearing for the first time in book form during the previous calendar year, and which is either non-fiction or, if fictional, is noteworthy primarily for aspects other than the fictional text content.

APPENDIX E - New Motions

The World Science Fiction Society

New Business First Presented at Bucconeer

4. New Business Part I

Items under this heading have not been given first passage, but do not require ratification at Aussiecon Three.

4.1 Petition to extend Susan Matthews' Campbell Award Eligibility

Susan R. Matthews' first novel, AN EXCHANGE OF HOSTAGES, was released in a limited edition in November, 1996 and then in a mass market edition in April, 1997. The first edition was intended to be a reading copy only - however in the mass market edition, the publisher (contrary to the usual practice) listed the earlier date as the official publication date. This means that, technically, 1997 is Susan Matthews' second, and final, year of eligibility for the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer.

The WSFS Constitution allows a work, which received limited exposure its first year, to be granted an additional year of eligibility for the Hugo Awards. We're asking that this year's Business Meeting follow the spirit of this rule and request that an additional year of eligibility for the Campbell Award be granted to Ms. Matthews. Stanley Schmidt, the administrator of this award for Dell Publications, agrees to this request.

John Lorentz & Ruth Sachter, Bucconeer Hugo Administrators

"RESOLVED, that this meeting believes that Susan Matthews' eligibility for the Campbell Award should be extended to include the Award presented at Aussiecon Three, the 1999 World Science Fiction Convention."

4.2 Short Titles

Resolved, to direct the Secretary, under the authority of Standing Rule 23, to modify the WSFS Constitution as follows:

In Section 1. 1, insert title "Name.".

In Section 1.2, insert title "Objectives.", and replace the numbering "1.2.1" to "1.2.5" with "(1)" to "(5)".

In Section 1.3, insert title "Restrictions.".

In Section 1.4, insert title "Membership.".

In Section 1.5, insert title "Memberships.".

In Section 1.6, insert title "Authority.".

In Section 1.7, insert title "Marks.".[1]

In Section 1.8, insert title "Financial Reports.".[1]

In Section 3.1, insert title "Voting", and number each sentence as a separate subsection.

In Section 3.2, insert title "Voter Eligibility.", and divide the section into two subsections as follows:

3.2.1: Voting shall be limited to WSFS members who have purchased at least a supporting membership in the Worldcon whose site is being selected.

3.2.2: The supporting membership rate shall be set by unanimous agreement of the current Worldcon Committee and all bidding committees who have filed before the ballot deadline. If agreement is not reached, the default fee shall be the median (middle value) of the US dollar fees used in the previous three (3) Worldcon site selections.

In Section 3.3, insert title "Non-natural Persons.".

In Section 3.4, insert title "Ballots.".

In Section 3.5, insert title "Tallying.".

In Section 3.6, insert title "Bid Eligibility.".[31

In Section 3.7, insert title "Site Eligibility.".

In Section 3.8, insert title "North America.", and replace the numbering "3.8.1" to "3.8.3" with "(1)" to "(3)".

In Section 3.9, insert title "NASFiC.".

In Section 3.10, insert title "Bid Presentations.".[l ]

In Section 3.11, insert title "Incapacity of Committees.".[1]

In Section 4. 1, insert title "WSFS Business Meetings.".[4]

In Section 4.2, insert title "Official Representative.".[l]

In Section 4.3, insert title "Continuation of Committees.".[4]

In Section 4.4, insert title "The Mark Protection Committee.". [2]

In Section 4.5, insert title "Duties of the Mark Protection Committee.".[2]

In Section 5.1, insert title "Conduct.".

In Section 5.2, insert title "Natural Persons.".

In Section 5.3, insert title "Amendment.".

In Section 5.4, insert title "Commencement.".

In Section 5.5, insert title "Standing Rules.".

In Section 5.6, insert title "Constitutional Pass-along.".[4]

In Section 5.7, insert title "Distribution of Rules.".[1]

Moved by the Nitpicking and Flyspecking Committee.

Discussion:

This adds titles to those sections that don't currently have them, and makes the numbering style consistent. This is a Good Thing. It also breaks up the text of Sections 3.1 and 3.2 into subsections for greater clarity, without amending any wording.

[1] These sections are unnecessary if "Committee Responsibility" is ratified.

[2] These sections are unnecessary if "Mark Protection Committee Clarifications" is ratified.

[3] This section is unnecessary if "Eligibility" is ratified.

[4] These sections are unnecessary if "Yet More Business" is ratified.

5. New Business Part II

Items under this heading have not been given first passage, and will become part of the Constitution only if ratified at Bucconeer and at Aussiecon Three.

5.1 Proposal to change the designation of the Hugo Awards from "Best" to "Most Popular"

One annual complaint of fans about the Hugo awards is that people nominate and vote for their favorite choices over other works of higher quality. This cannot be avoided in the type of voting system that the Hugo awards use. This is a proposal to address this perceived problem by changing the designation of the Hugo awards from "Best" to "Most Popular".

Specifically, moved to amend section 2.2 of the WSFS Constitution by replacing "Best" by "Most Popular" throughout.

Change Article II, Section 2.2.1 "Best Novel" to "Most Popular Novel".

Change Article II, Section 2.2.2 "Best Novella" to "Most Popular Novella".

Change Article II, Section 2.2.3 "Best Novellette" to "Most Popular Novellette".

Change Article II, Section 2.2.4 "Best Related Book" to "Most Popular Related Book".

Change Article 11, Section 2.2.5 "Best Dramatic Presentation" to "Most Popular Dramatic Presentation".

Change Article 11, Section 2.2.6 "Best Professional Editor" to "Most Popular Professional Editor".

Change Article 11, Section 2.2.7 "Best Professional Artist" to "Most Popular Professional Artist".

Change Article II, Section 2.2.8 "Best Semiprozine" to "Most Popular Semiprozine".

Change Article II, Section 2.2.9 "Best " to "Most Popular ".

Change Article II, Section 2.2.10 "Best Fanzine" to "Most Popular Fanzine".

Change Article II, Section 2.2.1 1 "Best Fan Writer" to "Most Popular Fan Writer".

Change Article II, Section 2.2.12 "Best Fan Artist" to "Most Popular Fan Artist".

 

Anne Davenport & Terry Neill

 

 

5.2 Tidying Site Selection

MOVED, to amend the WSFS Constitution as follows: [Text in brackets, including this text, is explanatory and not substantive.]

In Section 3. 1: replace "Voting shall be by mail or ballot cast at the current Worldcon with run-off ballot as described in Section 2.9" with "Voting shall be by written ballot cast either by mail or at the current Worldcon with tallying as described in Section 2.9".

In Section 3. 1: replace "administer the mail balloting" with "administer the voting".

[This brings the Constitution into line with current practice. It makes the Committee administer the whole process rather than just the mail balloting. This has been our practice since the abolition of the selection meeting in the 1970s.]

Replace Section 3.3 with the following new Section:

Section 3.3: Non-natural Persons. Corporations, associations, and other non-human or artificial entities may cast ballots, but only for "No Preference". "Guest of" memberships may only cast "No Preference" ballots. Memberships transferred to individual natural persons may cast preferential ballots, provided that the transfer is accepted by the administering convention.

[This rewords the section to clarify it. At the moment this section reads as if it is a restriction on who may cast 'No Preference" ballots. In fact, it relaxes the prohibition on non-natural persons casting votes in Section 5.2., so I have reworded the first sentence into active voice to clarify it. "Guest of" memberships generally have a natural person attached to them, but it may be different people at different times. This rewording would allow any membership transferred to a particular natural person to cast any ballot, which is probably what was originally intended.

Section 3.3 currently reads: ' "No Preference " ballots may be cast by corporations, associations, and other non-human or artificial entities. "Guest of" memberships must be transferred to individual natural persons before being cast for other than "No Preference ", with such transfers accepted by the administering convention.]

In Section 3.5.1, replace "with two (2) witnesses from each bidding committee allowed to observe." with ". Each bidding committee should provide at least two (2) tellers."

[Again, this is current practice. I have written 'should' rather than 'must' to prevent committees holding up the count by not providing their tellers.]

Delete Subsection 3.5.3, and insert the following new Subsections:

3.5.3: "None of the Above" shall be treated as a bid for tallying, and shall be the equivalent of "No

Award" with respect to Section 2.9.

3.5.5: If "None of the Above" wins, the duty of site selection shall devolve on the Business Meeting of the current Worldcon. If the Business Meeting is unable to decide by the end of the Worldcon, the Committee for the following Worldcon shall make the selection without undue delay.

3.5.6: Where a site and Committee are chosen by a Business Meeting or Worldcon Committee, they are not restricted by region or other qualifications, and the choice of an out-of-rotation site shall not affect the regional rotation for subsequent years.

[This breaks up the existing wording into three subsections. The only change in wording is the substitution of '"None of the Above"' for "it" at the start of Section 3.5.5.]

Moved by the Nitpicking and Flyspecking Committee

Discussion: This tidies the wording of Article 3. it requires the current committee to administer the whole voting process rather than just the mail balloting, and directs the bidding committees to provide tellers rather than allowing them to provide observers. This changes the Constitution to reflect what actually happens, so there is no actual change in powers.

5.3 No-Zone Rotation

Moved: To amend Article 111 by:

1. Deleting all of section 3.7 except the last sentence.

2. Replacing "sixty (60) " with "Five hundred (500)" in the last sentence of section 3.7

3. Replacing "the North American region eligible" with "North America" in the first sentence of Section 3.9

4. Deleting the first sentence of 3.9.2

Provided that any site which would have been eligible under the old rules will also be eligible in the first three races conducted under these eligibility rules.

Discussion:

This replaces the current zone system for site eligibility in North America with an unzoned system, in which a bid from any of the rotation zones is allowed to bid in any year. While the rotation system used to be necessary in order to prevent the Worldcon from staying in one geographic area, the decrease through the years in the number of locations that can hold a Worldcon will accomplish most of these results.

This system will also mean that if a group wishes to bid in a year, and has facilities available for that year, they will generally be eligible. And, if a group has its facility taken away by another group, it doesn't need to wait three years to rebid, but may do so when it is next able.

The exclusion zone is expanded from 60 miles to 500 to ensure that having a large number of local voters won't give one site a large proximity advantage in any race.

Moved by Ben Yalow and Bruce Pelz

Effect:

Section 3.7: A site outside North America is eligible for selection in any year. A Site within North America is eligible for selection if it is within the appropriate region as defined below. The North American regions shall rotate in the order Western, Central, Eastern region. A site shall be ineligible if it is within sixty (60) five hundred miles of the site at which selection occurs.

Section 3.9: If the selected Worldcon site is not in North America, there shall be a NASFiC in the North American region eligible North America that year. Selection of the NASFiC shall be by the identical procedure to the Worldcon selection except as provided below or elsewhere in this Constitution:

3.9.1: Voting shall be by written ballot administered by the following year's Worldcon, if there is no NASFiC in that year, or by the following year's NASFiC, if there is one, with ballots cast at the administering convention or by mail, and with only members of the administering convention allowed to vote.

3.9.2: Bids are restricted to sites in the appropriate regions. NASFiC Committees shall make all reasonable efforts to avoid conflicts with Worldcon dates.

3.9.3: The proposed NASFiC supporting membership rate can be set by unanimous agreement of the administering Committee and all bidding committees who have filed before the ballot deadline.

3.9.4: If "None of the Above " wins, or if no eligible bid files by the deadline, then no NASFiC shall be held and any supporting membership payments collected for the NASFiC site selection shall be refunded by the administering convention without undue delay.

 

APPENDIX F - Attendance List

World Science Fiction Society

Business Meeting, Bucconeer 1998

Attendance List

According to the sign-up sheet the following people were present at one or more days of the business meeting.

Donald Eastlake, Tim Illingworth, Pat McMurray, Kevin Standlee, Robbie Bourget, Lynn Anderson, Johnny Carruthers, Saul Jaffe, Neil Rest, Robert E Sacks, Ben Yalow, KIM Campbell, Ruth Sachter, Kent Bloom, George Flynn, Bjorn T Sund, Mark L Olson, Ben Schilling, Yvonne Penney, Lloyd Penney, Patty Wells, Fred Patten, Don A Timm, Rick Kovalchik, Jack Speer, Stephen Boucher, Bertie van Asseldonk, David W Clark, Dalroy Ward, Richard S Russell, Michael Mason, Bruce Pelz, Susan Matthews, Lew Wolkoff, Roger Wells, Regina Kirby, Paul Dormer, Gay Ellen Dennett, Jim Belfiore, Fred Webb, Winton E Matthews, Randall L Shepherd, Mark F Richards, John Lorentz, Louis Epstein, Michael Hopkins, Victoria A Smith, Michael Cothran, Mike Kennedy, Anne Davenport, Douglas Friauf, Robert Blair, Donald Bailey, Joseph Pearce, Leroy F Berven, Sara Paul, Tim Szczesuil, Rebecca C Prather, Fred Duarte Jr, Karen Meschke, Lucy Schmeidler, Joan Juozenas, Mark Richards, Don Cook, Seth Breidbart, Sharon Sbarsky, Pam Fremon, Mike Fisher, Dennis Caswell, Woody Bernardi, Peter Grace, Ken Smookler, Marah Searle, Erwin S. (Filthy Pierre) Strauss, Sue Francis, Vincent Docherty, Roger Wells, Paul R Oliver, Bob Macintosh, David Ratti, Vicki Rosenzweig, Cheryl Morgan. Eric Larson. Mike Glyer, Fred Webb, Linda Ross Mansfield, Mike Glicksohn, Michael Pins, Tom Stern, Perrianne Lurie, Stephen J Grosko, Mike Scott, Ann A Broomhead, G. Patrick Malloy, Naomi C Fisher, Bobbi Armbruster, James Daugherty, Leo Doroschenko, Sue Dyke, Chip Hitchcock, Samanda Jeude, Tom Veal, Tony E Parker, Rick Katze, Gary Keith Feldbaum, Larry Hancock, Bob Matthews, Todd Dashoff, Robin Johnson, Paula Lieberman, Danny Lieberman, Leslie Turek, Alexis Layton, Mark Trebing, Terry Sisk Greybill, Margaret Trebing, Will Lenden, Lincoln W Kliman, Alex von Thorn, Hope Leibowitz, Priscilla Olson, Deborah A King, Hank Smith, Merle von Thorn, Laurie Mann, Don Vallere, Gary S Blog, Bob Schwier, Arthur Aldridge, Cris Shuldiner

 

APPENDIX G - Committee Report: Polishing the Hugos

1. Remit

The Committee was constituted by the LoneStarCon 2 Business Meeting to consider two motions which were given initial passage there, and to report on them to the Bucconeer Business Meeting. These motions were:

1.1 Polishing the Hugos

and

1.2 Not Just Books

2. Polishing the Hugos

We considered "Polishing the Hugos" in four groups.

2.1 General (Section 2.2)

We agreed that Subsections 2.2.1, 3, 4, 6 and 7 are not a change. We feel that "in the various categories" could with advantage be dropped from 2.2.1.

We agreed that Subsection 2.2.2 is a change, but we do not feel that it's a problem.

We agreed that Subsection 2.2.5 is a change, and causes a problem that needs to be fixed, since the "author" of a Dramatic Presentation is not usually the person referred to as the "nominee". We believe that inserting "in the written fiction categories, " at the start of the subsection will fix this problem. This will limit the ability to withdraw a version of a work rather than all versions of a work to those categories in which it is currently allowed. This is thus a lesser change, and does not affect the ratification.

2.2 Categories (Section 2.3)

We are agreed that this group represents no change from current practice. In particular, George Flynn felt that:

As for the parliamentary history of "single dramatic unit": I think I drafted that clause, and the intention was to make exactly the same distinction as that between "serial" and "series" in the fiction categories. (The different language was necessary because that terminology isn't ordinarily used for dramas.) And I don't recall any instance in which it's been interpreted differently (much as some people might like to). I think "work appearing in a number of parts" exactly covers the intended sense of both "serial" and "dramatic unit," so I have no problems with that wording.

2.3 Counting (Sections 2.7-2.1 1)

We agreed that this group represents no change from current practice, though we feel that some of the wording might be improved.

2.4 Miscellaneous (Sections 2.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.12 & 2.13)

We agreed that this group represents no change from current practice.

3. Not Just Books

Insofar as our brief discussion had a conclusion, it was that the wording needed no changes. We are divided on the wisdom of making this change, but not about the wording.

 

4. Conclusion

We recommend the following amendments to "Polishing the Hugos":

In Section 2.2. 1, delete the words "in the various categories".

In Section 2.2.5, insert "In the written fiction categories, " at the start of the subsection

Or, in underline/strikethrough mode:

 

 

Section 2.2: General.

2.2.1: Unless otherwise specified, Hugo Awards are given in the various categories for work in the field of science fiction or fantasy appearing for the first time during the previous calendar year.

2.2.2: A work originally appearing in a language other than English shall also be eligible for the year in which it is first issued in English translation. A work, once it has appeared in English, may thus be eligible only once.

2.2.3: Publication date, or cover date in the case of a dated periodical, takes precedence over copyright date.

2.2.4: Works appearing in a series are eligible as individual works, but the series as a whole is not

eligible. However, a work appearing in a number of parts shall be eligible for the year of the final part.

2.2.5: In the written fiction categories, an author may withdraw a version of a work from consideration if the author feels that the version is not representative of what that author wrote.

2.2.6: The Worldcon Committee may relocate a story into a more appropriate category if it feels that it is necessary, provided that the length of the story is within the lesser of five thousand (5,000) words or twenty percent (20%) of the new category limits.

2.2.7: The Worldcon Committee is responsible for all matters concerning the Awards.

We do not recommend any changes to "Not Just Books".

Signed:

Tim Illingworth

Ben Yalow

Kevin Standlee

Saul Jaffe

George Flynn

Johnny Carruthers

APPENDIX H - Report of Mark Protection Committee

Minutes of the Meeting of the Mark Protection Committee

Held Wednesday, August 5, 1998, 7pm Marriott Inner Harbor

Present:

Committee Members: Scott Dennis, Stephen Boucher, Randall Shepherd, Kevin Standlee, Donald Eastlake, Robert Sacks, Tim Illingworth, Gary Keith Feldbaum, 'Zanne Labonville, Ben Yalow

Also present: George Flynn, Ken Smookler

Chairman: Randall Shepherd

Secretary: Gary Keith Feldbaum

The Chair reported that during the past year, the 1999 NASFiC Committee was given permission to use the domain 99nasfic.org at their own expense, in addition to 99.nasfic.org.

Inquiry was made regarding the possibility of registering the design of the Hugo as a design patent. The cost would be approximately $600 for initial filing fees, not including attorneys' fees or issuance costs.

The following resolution was moved by Mr. Standlee and passed unanimously after discussion:

That the Mark Protection Committee shall consult counsel on the advisability of applying for a service mark on the shape of the Hugo Awards rocket and to pursue the registration for a cost not to exceed $1,000 US.

Scott Dennis reported that he is making progress on developing a history of the licensing of the marks owned by WSFS.

Notice as given that the second meeting of the Mark Protection Committee will be held on Saturday following the business meeting in the same room as the business meeting, provided that the business meeting has adjourned sine die. Otherwise, it will be held Sunday following the conclusion of the business meeting in the same room.

Stephen Boucher reported that he is expecting to soon receive an invoice from our Australian attorneys for services rendered in connection with the protection of the marks in Australia, and that this invoice will be paid by the Australian Worldcon committee.

There was a discussion as to the requirements for the continued protection of the marks in Canada. A resolution was passed unanimously to authorize up to $500 Canadian, provided that funds are available, to take whatever steps are necessary to continue the registration of the marks in Canada.

George Flynn, postal officer, reported that the United States Post Office has assigned a new address to the Mark Protection Committee box. The physical box remains the same.

It was noted that the terms of the following members expire at the conclusion of this year's business meeting: Ben Yalow, Kevin Standlee and Tim Illingworth.

Having no further business, the meeting was then adjourned.

(These minutes are not yet approved by the Mark Protection Committee)

Gary Keith Feldbaum

 

Financial Report -- Mark Protection Committee-- World Science Fiction Society

Close of LoneStarCon II to opening of Bucconeer, September 1997- August 1998

 

Amount

Balance

Balance at close of LoneStarCon II

 

1318.58

Reimburse Mark Olson for expenses

-10.65

1307.93

Reimburse Donald Eastlake for expenses

-100.00

1207.93

Reimburse Scott Dennis for INTERNIC registration

-100.00

1107.93

Contribution from Robert Sacks (CSFA)

200.00

1307.93

Reimburse Mark Olson for P.O. Box & postage

-69.00

1238.93

Reimburse Scott Dennis for INTERNIC registration

-35.00

1203.93

Balance at opening of Bucconeer

 

1203.93

All amounts are in US dollars.

The Treasurer thanks Mr. Sacks for his generous contribution to the Mark Committee.

The Treasurer has not collected donations from Bucconeer, Aussiecon 3. or Chicon 2000. The traditional donation, as recommended by the Aussiecon 2 Business meeting, is $1 per vote cast at the convention's site selection. Including the 2001 Worldcon's traditional obligation, to be determined this weekend, the Treasurer anticipates that we have a reserve of about $6000.00 available if we need it. The Treasurer expects to collect the traditional donation from Bucconeer after the committee determines that it has a surplus left from operations.

 

-- Scott Dennis

5 August 1998

APPENDIX I - Worldcon Site Selection Results

Preliminary Site Selection Results for the 59th Worldcon

 

Bid

Mail In

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Total

Magicon 2

169

149

235

387

940

The Millennium PhilCon

181

184

237

543

1,145 Winner

KC in Boston

2

5

4

6

17

Orlando in Kansas City

 

1

   

1

Boston in Boston

   

1

 

1

Minneapolis in'73

 

1

 

1

2

SF @ Marriott Marquis in Atlanta, GA

     

1

1

Europa

     

3

3

Helsinki

     

1

1

None of the Above

   

1

1

2

           

Sub-Total with Preference

352

340

478

943

2,113

Votes Needed to Win

       

1,057

           

No Preference

15

2

10

28

55

           

Total Valid Ballots

367

342

488

971

2,168

Note: There were 8 ballots whose member validity were uncertain, as they could not affect the final outcome, a Winner was declared. A final report with the final totals will follow.

 

 

APPENDIX J - US Map with 250 and 500 Mile Circles

This document does not form part of the electronic record. A copy is attached to the printed version.

APPENDIX K - Mileage Charts

Table of City Distances Mark L Olson

In an attempt to bring the No-Zone discussion back to issues, I've re-done the city-pair tables using the city-pair server at http://www.hetherman.com/links/distance.html which uses great circle calculations on what appears to be city center co-ordinates, so it should be pretty good for most cities. (Ben points out that I should have used Anaheim rather than LA, but there appear to be no marginal cases there, so I'm not troubled enough by that to re-do the table.) Some details on how the calculations were done are at http://www.hetherman.con@links/distance.html, but one of the links off *that* has been down when I checked.

I couldn't include either The Hague or Brighton since the foreign city table is sparse compared to the US & Canada table.

Baltimore

Philadelphia

93

Atlanta

New Orleans

412

San Diego

Los Angeles

116

Pittsburgh

Chicago

413

Seattle

Portland

145

San Francisco

Las Vegas

420

Pittsburgh

Baltimore

195

Toronto

Boston

433

Miami

Orlando

201

Melbourne

Sydney

439

New York

Washington

204

Toronto

Chicago

441

Toronto

Detroit

209

Dallas

New Orleans

445

Atlanta

Nashville

213

Glasgow

Amsterdam

449

Houston

Dallas

224

Montreal

Baltimore

455

Toronto

Pittsburgh

225

New Orleans

Nashville

458

Los Angeles

Las Vegas

231

San Francisco

San Diego

460

Kansas City

St. Louis

235

Nashville

Pittsburgh

473

Detroit

Chicago

238

Pittsburgh

Boston

483

Cincinnati

Chicago

250

Toronto

Louisville

502

Boston

Montreal

253

San Antonio

New Orleans

517

Nashville

St. Louis

255

Montreal

Detroit

521

Vancouver

Portland

257

Orlando

New Orleans

528

Birmingham UK

London

258

Atlanta

Washington

544

Chicago

St. Louis

259

Portland

San Francisco

535

Boston

Philadelphia

268

Denver

Kansas City

554

Louisville

Chicago

270

Atlanta

Chicago

585

Chicago

Columbus

277

Phoenix

Denver

586

Birmingham UK

Amsterdam

285

Baltimore

Atlanta

578

San Diego

Phoenix

298

St. Louis

New Orleans

591

St. Louis

Cincinnati

311

Nashville

Baltimore

597

Toronto

Montreal

312

New Orleans

Louisville

611

Louisville

Atlanta

316

Orlando

Nashville

615

Houston

New Orleans

328

Las Vegas

Denver

616

Toronto

Columbus

315

Birmingham UK

Berlin

641

Detroit

Louisville

319

Columbus

Boston

644

Toronto

Baltimore

334

Toronto

Nashville

650

New York

Montreal

334

San Francisco

Phoenix

658

San Francisco

Los Angeles

344

Denver

Dallas

660

Pittsburgh

Louisville

344

Miami

New Orleans

664

Toronto

New York

347

Seattle

San Francisco

678

Toronto

Washington

351

New Orleans

Cincinnati

697

London

Glasgow

352

San Antonio

Kansas City

703

Minneapolis

Chicago

354

Orlando

Louisville

716

Berlin

Amsterdam

358

Winnipeg

Chicago

718

Boston

Baltimore

360

Boston

Cincinnati

741

Los Angeles

Phoenix

367

New York

Atlanta

748

Cincinnati

Atlanta

371

Chicago

Montreal

750

Winnipeg

Minneapolis

386

Orlando

Washington

759

London

Frankfurt

394

Nashville

New York

762

Boston

Washington

394

Los Angeles

Denver

844

Chicago

Nashville

394

San Antonio

Phoenix

848

Brighton

Glasgow

400*

Boston

Chicago

856

Washington DC

Cincinnati

403

Dallas

Phoenix

888

Atlanta

Orlando

405

Atlanta

Boston

938

Kansas City

Chicago

407

Los Angeles

Seattle

954

Minneapolis

Kansas City

408

Winnipeg

Toronto

943

Toronto

Cincinnati

411

Perth

Sydney

2037

[Note: I have taken the liberty of rearranging Mark's city-pairs so that all distances from any given city are adjacent. - Dave Ratti.]

Amsterdam

Berlin

358

Chicago

Toronto

441

Amsterdam

Birmingham UK

285

Chicago

Winnipeg

718

Amsterdam

Glasgow

449

Cincinnati

Boston

741

Atlanta

Baltimore

578

Cincinnati

Atlanta

371

Atlanta

Boston

938

Cincinnati

New Orleans

697

Atlanta

Chicago

585

Cincinnati

St. Louis

311

Atlanta

Cincinnati

371

Cincinnati

Toronto

411

Atlanta

Louisville

316

Cincinnati

Washington DC

403

Atlanta

Nashville

213

Columbus

Boston

644

Atlanta

New Orleans

412

Columbus

Chicago

277

Atlanta

New York

748

Columbus

Toronto

315

Atlanta

Orlando

405

Cincinnati

Chicago

250

Atlanta

Washington DC

544

Dallas

Denver

660

Baltimore

Atlanta

578

Dallas

Houston

224

Baltimore

Boston

360

Dallas

New Orleans

445

Baltimore

Montreal

455

Dallas

Phoenix

888

Baltimore

Nashville

597

Denver

Dallas

660

Baltimore

Philadelphia

93

Denver

Kansas City

554

Baltimore

Pittsburgh

195

Denver

Las Vegas

616

Baltimore

Toronto

334

Denver

Los Angeles

844

Berlin

Amsterdam

358

Denver

Phoenix

586

Berlin

Birmingham UK

641

Detroit

Chicago

238

Birmingham UK

Amsterdam

285

Detroit

Louisville

319

Birmingham UK

Berlin

641

Detroit

Montreal

521

Birmingham UK

London

258

Detroit

Toronto

209

Boston

Atlanta

938

Frankfurt

London

394

Boston

Baltimore

360

Glasgow

Amsterdam

449

Boston

Chicago

856

Glasgow

Brighton

400*

Boston

Cincinnati

741

Glasgow

London

352

Boston

Columbus

644

Houston

Dallas

224

Boston

Montreal

253

Houston

New Orleans

328

Boston

Philadelphia

268

Kansas City

Chicago

407

Boston

Pittsburgh

483

Kansas City

Denver

554

Boston

Toronto

433

Kansas City

Minneapolis

408

Boston

Washington DC

394

Kansas City

San Antonio

703

Brighton

Glasgow

400*

Kansas City

St. Louis

235

Chicago

Atlanta

585

Las Vegas

Denver

616

Chicago

Boston

856

Las Vegas

Los Angeles

231

Chicago

Columbus

277

Las Vegas

San Francisco

420

Chicago

Cincinnati

250

London

Birmingham UK

258

Chicago

Detroit

238

London

Frankfurt

394

Chicago

Kansas City

407

London

Glasgow

352

Chicago

Louisville

270

Los Angeles

Denver

844

Chicago

Minneapolis

354

Los Angeles

Las Vegas

231

Chicago

Montreal

750

Los Angeles

Phoenix

367

Chicago

Nashville

394

Los Angeles

San Diego

116

Chicago

Pittsburgh

413

Los Angeles

San Francisco

344

Chicago

St. Louis

259

Los Angeles

Seattle

954

Louisville

Atlanta

316

Phoenix

San Francisco

658

Louisville

Chicago

270

Pittsburgh

Baltimore

195

Louisville

Detroit

319

Pittsburgh

Boston

483

Louisville

New Orleans

611

Pittsburgh

Chicago

413

Louisville

Orlando

716

Pittsburgh

Louisville

344

Louisville

Pittsburgh

344

Pittsburgh

Nashville

473

Louisville

Toronto

502

Pittsburgh

Toronto

225

Melbourne

Sydney

439

Portland

San Francisco

535

Miami

New Orleans

664

Portland

Seattle

145

Miami

Orlando

201

Portland

Vancouver

257

Minneapolis

Chicago

354

San Antonio

Kansas City

703

Minneapolis

Kansas City

408

San Antonio

New Orleans

517

Minneapolis

Winnipeg

386

San Antonio

Phoenix

848

Montreal

Baltimore

455

San Diego

Los Angeles

116

Montreal

Boston

253

San Diego

Phoenix

298

Montreal

Chicago

750

San Diego

San Francisco

460

Montreal

Detroit

521

San Francisco

Las Vegas

420

Montreal

New York

334

San Francisco

Los Angeles

344

Montreal

Toronto

312

San Francisco

Phoenix

658

Nashville

Atlanta

213

San Francisco

Portland

535

Nashville

Baltimore

597

San Francisco

San Diego

460

Nashville

Chicago

394

San Francisco

Seattle

678

Nashville

New Orleans

458

Seattle

Los Angeles

954

Nashville

New York

762

Seattle

Portland

145

Nashville

Orlando

615

Seattle

San Francisco

678

Nashville

Pittsburgh

473

St. Louis

Chicago

259

Nashville

St. Louis

255

St. Louis

Cincinnati

311

Nashville

Toronto

650

St. Louis

Kansas City

235

New Orleans

Atlanta

412

St. Louis

Nashville

255

New Orleans

Cincinnati

697

St. Louis

New Orleans

591

New Orleans

Dallas

445

Sydney

Melbourne

439

New Orleans

Houston

328

Sydney

Perth

2037

New Orleans

Louisville

611

Toronto

Baltimore

334

New Orleans

Miami

664

Toronto

Boston

433

New Orleans

Nashville

458

Toronto

Chicago

441

New Orleans

Orlando

528

Toronto

Cincinnati

411

New Orleans

San Antonio

517

Toronto

Columbus

315

New Orleans

St. Louis

591

Toronto

Detroit

209

New York

Atlanta

748

Toronto

Louisville

502

New York

Montreal

334

Toronto

Montreal

312

New York

Nashville

762

Toronto

Nashville

650

New York

Toronto

347

Toronto

New York

347

New York

Washington DC

204

Toronto

Pittsburgh

225

Orlando

Atlanta

405

Toronto

Washington DC

351

Orlando

Louisville

716

Toronto

Winnipeg

943

Orlando

Miami

201

Vancouver

Portland

257

Orlando

Nashville

615

Washington DC

Atlanta

544

Orlando

New Orleans

528

Washington DC

Boston

394

Orlando

Washington DC

759

Washington DC

New York

204

Perth

Sydney

2037

Washington DC

Orlando

759

Philadelphia

Boston

268

Washington DC

Toronto

351

Phoenix

Dallas

888

Washington DC

Cincinnati

403

Phoenix

Denver

586

Winnipeg

Chicago

718

Phoenix

Los Angeles

367

Winnipeg

Minneapolis

386

Phoenix

San Antonio

848

Winnipeg

Toronto

943

Phoenix

San Diego

298

     

 

 

APPENDIX L - WSFS Constitution, With Amendments Ratified at Bucconeer

CONSTITUTION

of the World Science Fiction Society, September 1998

 

 

[Secretary: Many of the changes at Baltimore involved the renumbering of articles and the rearranging of text, without altering the content. Substantive changes that were ratified at the WSFS Business Meeting at Bucconeer (Baltimore, 1998) are shown as underline type for additions and strikethrough type for deletions. Almost every article has been renumbered. The old Articles II and IV (current Articles III and V) have been completely replaced. Current Article II is new. Old section 3.6 (new section 4.6) has been completely replaced. Short titles have been added, but are not separately underlined.]

 

Article I - Name, Objectives, Membership, and Organization

Section 1.1: Name. The name of this organization shall be the World Science Fiction Society, hereinafter referred to as WSFS or the Society.

Section 1.2: Objectives. WSFS is an unincorporated literary society whose functions are:

(1) To choose the recipients of the annual Hugo Awards (Science Fiction Achievement Awards).

(2) To choose the locations and Committees for the annual World Science Fiction Conventions (hereinafter referred to as Worldcons).

(3) To attend those Worldcons.

(4) To choose the locations and Committees for the occasional North American Science Fiction Conventions (hereinafter referred to as NASFiCs).

(5) To perform such other activities as may be necessary or incidental to the above purposes.

Section 1.3: Restrictions. No part of the Society’s net earnings shall be paid to its members, officers, or other private persons except in furtherance of the Society’s purposes. The Society shall not attempt to influence legislation or any political campaign for public office. Should the Society dissolve, its assets shall be distributed by the current Worldcon Committee or the appropriate court having jurisdiction, exclusively for charitable purposes. In this section, references to the Society include the Mark Protection Committee and all other agencies of the Society but not convention bidding or operating committees.

Section 1.4: Membership. The Membership of WSFS shall consist of all people who have paid membership dues to the Committee of the current Worldcon. Within ninety (90) days after a Worldcon, the administering Committee shall, except where prohibited by local law, forward its best information as to the names and postal addresses of all of its Worldcon members to the Committee of the next Worldcon.

Section 1.5: Memberships.

1.5.1: Each Worldcon shall offer supporting and attending memberships.

1.5.2: The rights of supporting members of a Worldcon include the right to receive all of its generally distributed publications.

1.5.3: The rights of attending members of a Worldcon include the rights of supporting members plus the right of general attendance at said Worldcon and at the WSFS Business Meeting held thereat.

1.5.4: Members of WSFS who cast a site-selection ballot with the required fee shall be supporting members of the selected Worldcon.

1.5.5: Voters have the right to convert to attending membership in the selected Worldcon within ninety (90) days of its selection, for an additional fee set by its committee. This fee must not exceed two (2) times the site-selection fee and must not exceed the difference between the site-selection fee and the fee for new attending members.

1.5.5: The Worldcon Committee shall make provision for persons to become supporting members for no more than one hundred and twenty-five percent (125%) of the site-selection fee, or such higher amount as has been approved by the Business Meeting, until a cutoff date no earlier than ninety (90) days before their Worldcon.

1.5.7: Other memberships and fees shall be at the discretion of the Worldcon Committee.

Section 1.6: Authority. Authority and responsibility for all matters concerning the Worldcon, except those reserved herein to WSFS, shall rest with the Worldcon Committee, which shall act in its own name and not in that of WSFS.

Section 1.7: Every Worldcon Committee shall include the following notice in each of its publications:

"World Science Fiction Society", "WSFS", "World Science Fiction Convention", "Worldcon", "NASFiC", and "Hugo Award" are service marks of the World Science Fiction Society, an unincorporated literary society.

Section 1.8:

1.8.1: Each Worldcon Committee should dispose of surplus funds remaining after accounts are settled for the current Worldcon for the benefit of WSFS as a whole. Each Worldcon Committee shall submit an annual financial report, including a statement of income and expenses, to each WSFS Business Meeting after the Committee’s selection. Each Worldcon Committee shall submit a report on its cumulative surplus/loss at the next Business Meeting after its Worldcon. In the event of a surplus, subsequent annual financial reports regarding the disbursement of said Worldcon surplus shall be filed at each year’s Business Meeting by the Worldcon Committee, or any alternative organizational entity established to oversee and disburse that surplus, until the surplus is totally expended or an amount equal to the original surplus has been disbursed.

1.8.2: Any member of the Society shall have the right, under reasonable conditions, to examine the financial records and books of account of the current Worldcon Committee, all future selected Worldcon Committees, and the two immediately preceding Worldcon Committees.

Section 1.7: The Mark Protection Committee.

1.7.1: There shall be a Mark Protection Committee of WSFS, which shall be responsible for registration and protection of the marks used by or under the authority of WSFS.

1.7.2: The Mark Protection Committee shall submit to the Business Meeting at each Worldcon a report of its activities since the previous Worldcon, including a statement of income and expense.

1.7.3: The Mark Protection Committee shall hold a meeting at each Worldcon after the end of the Business Meeting, at a time and place announced at the Business Meeting.

1.7.4: The Mark Protection Committee shall determine and elect its own officers.

Section 1.8: Membership of the Mark Protection Committee.

1.8.1: The Mark Protection Committee shall consist of:

1: one (1) member appointed to serve at the pleasure of each future selected Worldcon Committee and each of the two (2) immediately preceding Worldcon Committees

2: one (1) member appointed to serve at the pleasure of each future selected NASFiC Committee and for each Committee of a NASFIC held in the previous two years, and

3: nine (9) members elected three (3) each year to staggered three-year terms by the Business Meeting.

1.8.2: No more than three elected members may represent any single North American region, as defined in Section 4.8. Each elected member shall represent the region (if any) in which the member resided at the time they were elected.

1.8.3: Newly elected members take their seats, and the term of office ends for elected and appointed members whose terms expire that year, at the end of the Business Meeting.

1.8.4: If vacancies occur in elected memberships in the Committee, the remainder of the position's term may be filled by the Business Meeting, and until then temporarily filled by the Committee.

Article II - Powers and Duties of Worldcon Committees

Section 2.1: Duties. Each Worldcon Committee shall, in accordance with this Constitution, provide for

1: administering the Hugo Awards,

2: administering any future Worldcon or NASFIC site selection required, and

3: holding a WSFS Business Meeting.

Section 2.2: Marks. Every Worldcon and NASFIC Committee shall include the following notice in each of its publications:

"World Science Fiction Society", "WSFS", "World Science Fiction Convention", "Worldcon", "NASFiC", and "Hugo Award" are service marks of the World Science Fiction Society, an unincorporated literary society.

Section 2.3: Official Representative. Each future selected Worldcon Committee shall designate an official representative to the Business Meeting to answer questions about their Worldcon.

Section 2.4: Distribution of Rules. The current Worldcon Committee shall print copies of the WSFS Constitution, together with an explanation of proposed changes approved but not yet ratified, and copies of the Standing Rules. The Committee shall distribute these documents to all WSFS members at a point between nine and three months prior to the Worldcon, and shall also distribute them to all WSFS members in attendance at the Worldcon upon registration.

Section 2.5: Bid Presentations. Each Worldcon Committee shall provide a reasonable opportunity for bona fide bidding committees for the Worldcon to be selected the following year to make presentations.

Section 2.6: Incapacity of Committees. With sites being selected three (3) years in advance, there are at least three selected current or future Worldcon Committees at all times. If one of these should be unable to perform its duties, the other selected current or future Worldcon Committee whose site is closer to the site of the one unable to perform its duties shall determine what action to take, by consulting the Business Meeting or by mail poll of WSFS if there is sufficient time, or by decision of the Committee if there is not sufficient time.

Section 2.7: Membership Pass-along. Within ninety (90) days after a Worldcon, the administering Committee shall, except where prohibited by local law, forward its best information as to the names and postal addresses of all of its Worldcon members to the Committee of the next Worldcon.

Section 2.8: Financial Openness. Any member of WSFS shall have the right, under reasonable conditions, to examine the financial records and books of account of the current Worldcon Committee, all future selected Worldcon Committees, and the two immediately preceding Worldcon Committees.

Section 2.9: Financial Reports.

2.9.1: Each future selected Worldcon Committee shall submit an annual financial report, including a statement of income and expenses, to each WSFS Business Meeting after the Committee's selection.

2.9.2: Each Worldcon Committee shall submit a report on its cumulative surplus/loss at the next Business Meeting after its Worldcon.

2.9.3: Each Worldcon Committee should dispose of surplus funds remaining after accounts are settled for the current Worldcon for the benefit of WSFS as a whole.

2.9.4: In the event of a surplus, the Worldcon Committee, or any alternative organizational entity established to oversee and disburse that surplus, shall file annual financial reports regarding the disbursement of that surplus at each year's Business Meeting, until the surplus is totally expended or an amount equal to the original surplus has been disbursed.

 

Article III - Hugo Awards

Section 3.1: Introduction. Selection of the Hugo Awards shall be made as provided in this Article.

Section 3.2: General.

3.2.1: Unless otherwise specified, Hugo Awards are given for work in the field of science fiction or fantasy appearing for the first time during the previous calendar year.

3.2.2: A work originally appearing in a language other than English shall also be eligible for the year in which it is first issued in English translation. A work, once it has appeared in English, may thus be eligible only once.

3.2.3: Publication date, or cover date in the case of a dated periodical, takes precedence over copyright date.

3.2.4: Works appearing in a series are eligible as individual works, but the series as a whole is not eligible. However, a work appearing in a number of parts shall be eligible for the year of the final part.

3.2.5: In the written fiction categories, an author may withdraw a version of a work from consideration if the author feels that the version is not representative of what that author wrote.

3.2.6: The Worldcon Committee may relocate a story into a more appropriate category if it feels that it is necessary, provided that the length of the story is within the lesser of five thousand (5,000) words or twenty percent (20%) of the new category limits.

3.2.7: The Worldcon Committee is responsible for all matters concerning the Awards.

Section 3.3: Categories.

3.3.1: Best Novel. A science fiction or fantasy story of forty thousand (40,000) words or more.

3.3.2: Best Novella. A science fiction or fantasy story of between seventeen thousand five hundred (17,500) and forty thousand (40,000) words.

3.3.3: Best Novelette. A science fiction or fantasy story of between seven thousand five hundred (7,500) and seventeen thousand five hundred (1 7,500) words.

3.3.4: Best Short Story. A science fiction or fantasy story of less than seven thousand five hundred (7,500) words.

3.3.5: Best Related Book. Any work whose subject is related to the field of science fiction, fantasy, or fandom, appearing for the first time in book form during the previous calendar year, and which is either non-fiction or, if fictional, is noteworthy primarily for aspects other than the fictional text.

3.3.6: Best Dramatic Presentation. Any production in any medium of dramatized science fiction, fantasy or related subjects which has been publicly presented for the first time in its present dramatic form during the previous calendar year.

3.3.7: Best Professional Editor. The editor of any professional publication devoted primarily to science fiction or fantasy during the previous calendar year. A professional publication is one which had an average press run of at least ten thousand (10,000) copies per issue.

3.3.8: Best Professional Artist. An illustrator whose work has appeared in a professional publication in the field of science fiction or fantasy during the previous calendar year.

3.3.9: Best Semiprozine. Any generally available non-professional publication devoted to science fiction or fantasy which by the close of the previous calendar year has published four (4) or more issues, at least one (1) of which appeared in the previous calendar year, and which in the previous calendar year met at least two (2) of the following criteria:

1: had an average press run of at least one thousand (1000) copies per issue,

2: paid its contributors and/or staff in other than copies of the publication,

3: provided at least half the income of any one person,

4: had at least fifteen percent (15%) of its total space occupied by advertising,

5: announced itself to be a semiprozine.

3.3.10: Best Fanzine. Any generally available non-professional publication devoted to science fiction, fantasy, or related subjects which by the close of the previous calendar year has published four (4) or more issues, at least one (1) of which appeared in the previous calendar year, and which does not qualify as a semiprozine.

3.3.11: Best Fan Writer. Any person whose writing has appeared in semiprozines or fanzines or in generally available electronic media during the previous calendar year.

3.3.12: Best Fan Artist. An artist or cartoonist whose work has appeared through publication in semiprozines or fanzines or through other public display during the previous calendar year. Any person whose name appears on the final Hugo Awards ballot for a given year under the Professional Artist category shall not be eligible in the Fan Artist category for that year.

3.3.13: Additional Category. Not more than one special category may be created by the current Worldcon Committee with nomination and voting to be the same as for the permanent categories. The Worldcon Committee is not required to create any such category; such action by a Worldcon Committee should be under exceptional circumstances only; and the special category created by one Worldcon Committee shall not be binding on following Committees. Awards created under this paragraph shall be considered to be Hugo Awards.

Section 3.4: Extended Eligibility. In the event that a potential Hugo Award nominee receives extremely limited distribution in the year of its first publication or presentation, its eligibility may be extended for an additional year by a three fourths (3/4) vote of the intervening Business Meeting of WSFS.

Section 3.5: Name and Design. The Hugo Award shall continue to be standardized on the rocket ship design of Jack McKnight and Ben Jason. Each Worldcon Committee may select its own choice of base design. The name (Hugo Award) and the design shall not be extended to any other award.

Section 3.6: "No Award". At the discretion of an individual Worldcon Committee, if the lack of nominations or final votes in a specific category shows a marked lack of interest in that category on the part of the voters, the Award in that category shall be canceled for that year.

Section 3.7: Nominations.

3.7.1: The Worldcon Committee shall conduct a poll to select the nominees for the final Award voting. Each member of either the administering or the immediately preceding Worldcon as of January 31 of the current calendar year shall be allowed to make up to five (5) equally weighted nominations in every category.

3.7.2: The Committee shall include with each nomination ballot a copy of Article III of the WSFS Constitution.

3.7.3: Nominations shall be solicited only for the Hugo Awards and the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer.

Section 3.8: Tallying of Nominations.

3.8.1: Except as provided below, the final Award ballots shall list in each category the five eligible nominees receiving the most nominations. If there is a tie including fifth place, all the tied eligible nominees shall be listed.

3.8.2: The Worldcon Committee shall determine the eligibility of nominees and assignment to the proper category of nominees nominated in more than one category.

3.8.3: Any nominations for "No Award" shall be disregarded.

3.8.4: If a nominee appears on a nomination ballot more than once in any one category, only one nomination shall be counted in that category.

3.8.5: No nominee shall appear on the final Award ballot if it received fewer nominations than five percent (5%) of the number of ballots listing one or more nominations in that category, except that the first three eligible nominees, including any ties, shall always be listed.

Section 3.9: Notification and Acceptance. Worldcon Committees shall use reasonable efforts to notify the nominees, or in the case of deceased or incapacitated persons, their heirs, assigns, or legal guardians, in each category prior to the release of such information. Each nominee shall be asked at that time to either accept or decline the nomination. If the nominee declines nomination, that nominee shall not appear on the final ballot.

Section 3.10: Voting.

3.10.1: Final Award voting shall be by mail, with ballots sent only to WSFS members. Final Award ballots shall include name, signature, address, and membership-number spaces to be filled in by the voter.

3.10.2: Final Award ballots shall list only the Hugo Awards and the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer.

3.10.3: "No Award" shall be listed in each category of Hugo Award on the final ballot.

3.10.4: The Committee shall, on or with the final ballot, designate, for each nominee in the printed fiction categories, one or more books, anthologies, or magazines in which the nominee appeared (including the book publisher or magazine issue date(s)).

3.10.5: Voters shall indicate the order of their preference for the nominees in each category.

Section 3.11: Tallying of Votes.

3.11.1: In each category, votes shall first be tallied by the voter's first choices. If no majority is then obtained, the nominee who places last in the initial tallying shall be eliminated and the ballots listing it as first choice shall be redistributed on the basis of those ballots' second choices. This process shall be repeated until a majority-vote winner is obtained.

3.11.2: No Award shall be given whenever the total number of valid ballots cast for a specific category (excluding those cast for "No Award" in first place) is less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total number of final Award ballots received.

3.11.3: After a tentative winner is determined, then unless "No Award" shall be the winner, the following additional test shall be made. If the number of ballots preferring "No Award" to the tentative winner is greater than the number of ballots preferring the tentative winner to "No Award", then "No Award" shall be declared the winner of the election.

3.11.4: The complete numerical vote totals, including all preliminary tallies for first, second, ... places, shall be made public by the Worldcon Committee within ninety (90) days after the Worldcon. During the same period the nomination voting totals shall also be published, including in each category the vote counts for at least the fifteen highest vote-getters and any other candidate receiving a number of votes equal to at least five percent (5%) of the nomination ballots cast in that category.

Section 3.12: Exclusions. No member of the current Worldcon Committee nor any publications closely connected with a member of the Committee shall be eligible for an Award. However, should the Committee delegate all authority under this Article to a Subcommittee whose decisions are irrevocable by the Worldcon Committee, then this exclusion shall apply to members of the Subcommittee only.

Section 3.13: Retrospective Hugos. A Worldcon held 50, 75, or 100 years after a Worldcon at which no Hugos were presented may conduct nominations and elections for Hugos which would have been presented at that previous Worldcon. Procedures shall be as for the current Hugos. Categories receiving insufficient numbers of nominations may be dropped. Once retrospective Hugos have been awarded for a Worldcon, no other Worldcon shall present retrospective Hugos for that Worldcon.

 

Article IV - Future Worldcon Selection

Section 4.1: Voting.

4.1.1: WSFS shall choose the location and Committee of the Worldcon to be held three (3) years from the date of the current Worldcon.

4.1.2: Voting shall be by mail or ballot cast at the current Worldcon with run-off ballot as described in Section 3.11.

4.1.3: The current Worldcon Committee shall administer the mail balloting, collect the advance membership fees, and turn over those funds to the winning Committee before the end of the current Worldcon.

4.1.4: The site-selection voting totals shall be announced at the Business Meeting and published in the first or second Progress Report of the winning Committee, with the by-mail and at-convention votes distinguished.

Section 4.2: Voter Eligibility.

4.2.1: Voting shall be limited to WSFS members who have purchased at least a supporting membership in the Worldcon whose site is being selected.

4.2.2: The supporting membership rate shall be set by unanimous agreement of the current Worldcon Committee and all bidding committees who have filed before the ballot deadline. If agreement is not reached, the default fee shall be the median (middle value) of the US dollar fees used in the previous three (3) Worldcon site selections.

Section 4.3: Non-Natural Persons. "No Preference" ballots may be cast by corporations, associations, and other non-human or artificial entities. "Guest of" memberships must be transferred to individual natural persons before being cast for other than "No Preference", with such transfers accepted by the administering convention.

Section 4.4: Ballots. Site-selection ballots shall include name, signature, address, and membership-number spaces to be filled in by the voter. Each site-selection ballot shall list the options "None of the Above" and "No Preference" and provide for write-in votes, after the bidders and with equal prominence. The supporting membership rate shall be listed on all site-selection ballots.

Section 4.5: Tallying.

4.5.1: The name and address information shall be separated from the ballots and the ballots counted only at the Worldcon with two (2) witnesses from each bidding committee allowed to observe. Each bidding committee may make a record of the name and address of every voter.

4.5.2: A ballot voted with first or only choice for "No Preference" shall be ignored for site selection. A ballot voted with lower than first choice for "No Preference" shall be ignored if all higher choices on the ballot have been eliminated in preferential tallying.

4.5.3: "None of the Above" shall be treated as a bid for tallying and shall be the equivalent of "No Award" with respect to Section 3.11. If it wins, the duty of site selection shall devolve on the Business Meeting of the current Worldcon. If the Business Meeting is unable to decide by the end of the Worldcon, the Committee for the following Worldcon shall make the selection without undue delay. When a site and Committee are chosen by a Business Meeting or Worldcon Committee, they are not restricted by region or other qualifications, and the choice of an out-of-rotation site shall not affect the regional rotation for subsequent years.

4.5.4: All ballots shall be initially tallied by their first preferences, even if cast for a bid that the administering Committee has ruled ineligible. If no eligible bid achieves a majority on the first round of tallying, then on the second round all ballots for ineligible bids shall be redistributed to their first eligible choices, and tallying shall proceed according to normal preferential-ballot procedures.

Section 4.6: Bid Eligibility.

4.6.1: To be eligible for site selection, a bidding committee must file the following documents with the Committee that will administer the voting:

(1) an announcement of intent to bid;

(2) adequate evidence of an agreement with its proposed site's facilities, such as a conditional contract or a letter of agreement;

(3) the rules under which the Worldcon Committee will operate, including a specification of the term of office of their chief executive officer or officers and the conditions and procedures for the selection and replacement of such officer or officers.

4.6.2: The bidding committee must supply written copies of these documents to any member of WSFS on request.

4.6.3: For a bid to be allowed on the printed ballot, the bidding committee must file the documents specified above no later than 180 days prior to the official opening of the administering convention.

4.6.4: To be eligible as a write-in, the bidding committee must file the documents specified above by the close of the voting.

4.6.5: If no bids meet these qualifications, the selection shall proceed as though "None of the Above" had won.

Section 4.7: Site Eligibility. A site outside North America is eligible for selection in any year. A site within North America is eligible for selection if it is within the appropriate region, as defined below. The North American regions shall rotate in the order Western, Central, Eastern region. A site shall be ineligible if it is within sixty (60) miles of the site at which selection occurs.

Section 4.8: North America. To ensure equitable distribution of sites within North America, it is divided into three (3) regions as follows:

(1) Western. Baja California, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Saskatchewan, and all states, provinces, and territories westward including Hawaii, Alaska, the Yukon, and the Northwest Territories.

(2) Central. Central America, the islands of the Caribbean, Mexico (except as above), and all states, provinces, and territories between the Western and Eastern regions.

(3) Eastern. Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, Quebec, and all states, provinces, and territories eastward including the District of Columbia, St. Pierre et Miquelon, Bermuda, and the Bahamas.

Section 4.9: NASFiC

If the selected Worldcon site is not in North America, there shall be a NASFiC in the North American region eligible that year. Selection of the NASFiC shall be by the identical procedure to the Worldcon selection except as provided below or elsewhere in this Constitution:

4.9.1: Voting shall be by written ballot administered by the following year’s Worldcon, if there is no NASFiC in that year, or by the following year’s NASFiC, if there is one, with ballots cast at the administering convention or by mail, and with only members of the administering convention allowed to vote.

4.9.2: Bids are restricted to sites in the appropriate region. NASFiC Committees shall make all reasonable efforts to avoid conflicts with Worldcon dates.

4.9.3: The proposed NASFiC supporting membership rate can be set by unanimous agreement of the administering Committee and all bidding committees who have filed before the ballot deadline.

4.9.4: If "None of the Above" wins, or if no eligible bid files by the deadline, then no NASFiC shall be held and any supporting membership payments collected for the NASFiC site selection shall be refunded by the administering convention without undue delay.

Section 3.10: Each Worldcon Committee shall provide a reasonable opportunity for bona fide bidding committees for the Worldcon to be selected one year hence to make presentations.

Section 3.11: With sites being selected three (3) years in advance, there are at least three selected current or future Worldcon Committees at all times. If one of these should be unable to perform its duties, the other selected current or future Worldcon Committee whose site is closest to the site of the one unable to perform its duties shall determine what action to take, by consulting the Business Meeting or by mail poll of WSFS if there is sufficient time, or by decision of the Committee if there is not sufficient time.

Article V - Powers of the Business Meeting

Section 5.1: WSFS Business Meetings.

5.1.1: Business Meetings of WSFS shall be held at advertised times at each Worldcon.

5.1.2: The current Worldcon Committee shall provide the Presiding Officer and Staff for each Meeting.

5.1.3: The Business Meeting may adopt Standing Rules for its own governance.

5.1.4: Meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of (in descending order of precedence) the WSFS Constitution; the Standing Rules; such other rules as may be published in advance by the current Committee (which rules may be suspended by the Business Meeting by the same procedure as a Standing Rule); the customs and usages of WSFS (including the resolutions and rulings of continuing effect); and the current edition of Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised.

5.1.5: The quorum for the Business Meeting shall be twelve members of the Society physically present.

Section 5.2: Continuation of Committees. Except as otherwise provided in this Constitution, any committee or other position created by a Business Meeting shall lapse at the end of the next following Business Meeting that does not vote to continue it.

Section 5.3: Constitutional Pass-along. Within two (2) months after the end of each Worldcon, the Business Meeting staff shall send a copy of all changes to the Constitution and Standing Rules, and all items awaiting ratification, to the next Worldcon Committee

Article VI - Constitution

Section 6.1: Conduct. The conduct of the affairs of WSFS shall be determined by this Constitution together with all ratified amendments hereto and such Standing Rules as the Business Meeting shall adopt for its own governance.

Section 6.2: Natural Persons. In all matters arising under this Constitution, only natural persons may introduce business, nominate, or vote, except as specifically provided otherwise in this Constitution. No person may cast more than one vote on any issue or more than one ballot in any election. This shall not be interpreted to prohibit delivery of ballots cast by other eligible voters.

Section 6.3: Amendment. The WSFS Constitution may be amended by a motion passed by a simple majority at any Business Meeting but only to the extent that such motion is ratified by a simple majority at the Business Meeting of the subsequent Worldcon.

Section 6.4: Commencement. Any change to the Constitution of WSFS shall take effect at the end of the Worldcon at which such change is ratified, except that no change imposing additional costs or financial obligations upon Worldcon Committees shall be binding upon any Committee already selected at the time when it takes effect.

Section 6.5: Standing Rules. Standing Rules for the Governance of the Business Meeting and related activities may be adopted or amended by a majority vote at any Business Meeting. Amendments to Standing Rules shall take effect at the close of the Worldcon where they are adopted; this rule may be suspended by a two-thirds (2/3) vote.

Section 5.6: Within two (2) months after the end of each Worldcon, the Business Meeting staff shall send a copy of all changes to the Constitution and Standing Rules, and all items awaiting ratification, to the next Worldcon Committee.

Section 5.7: Distribution of Rules. The Constitution of WSFS, together with an explanation of proposed changes approved but not yet ratified, and the Standing Rules shall be printed by the current Worldcon Committee, distributed to all WSFS members at a point between nine and three months prior to the Worldcon, and distributed to all WSFS members in attendance at the Worldcon upon registration.

 

The above copy of the World Science Fiction Society’s Constitution is hereby Certified to be True, Correct, and Complete:

 

Tim Illingworth, Chairman of Business Meeting

Pat McMurray, Secretary of Business Meeting

 

APPENDIX M - Business Passed On to Aussiecon Three

[1998 Business Meeting Secretary has altered the section numbers and added short titles in these Proposed Constitutional Amendments to match the Constitution. The text in brackets within Section 3.1 is by the proposer of the amendment, not the Business Meeting Secretary.]

3.1 Tidying Site Selection

 

MOVED, to amend the WSFS Constitution as follows:

In Section 4.1: replace "Voting shall be by mail or ballot cast at the current Worldcon with run-off ballot as described in Section 3.11" with "Voting shall be by written ballot cast either by mail or at the current Worldcon with tallying as described in Section 3.11".

In Section 4. 1: replace "administer the mail balloting" with "administer the voting".

Replace Section 4.3 with the following new Section:

Section 4.3: Non-natural Persons. Corporations, associations, and other non-human or artificial entities may cast ballots, but only for "No Preference". "Guest of" memberships may only cast "No Preference" ballots. Memberships transferred to individual natural persons may cast preferential ballots, provided that the transfer is accepted by the administering convention.

In Section 4.5.1, replace "with two (2) witnesses from each bidding committee allowed to observe." with ". Each bidding committee should provide at least two (2) tellers."

Delete Subsection 4.5.3, and insert the following new Subsections:

4.5.3: "None of the Above" shall be treated as a bid for tallying, and shall be the equivalent of "No Award" with respect to Section 2.9.

4.5.5: If "None of the Above" wins, the duty of site selection shall devolve on the Business Meeting of the current Worldcon. If the Business Meeting is unable to decide by the end of the Worldcon, the Committee for the following Worldcon shall make the selection without undue delay.

4.5.6: Where a site and Committee are chosen by a Business Meeting or Worldcon Committee, they are not restricted by region or other qualifications, and the choice of an out-of-rotation site shall not affect the regional rotation for subsequent years.

Moved by the Nitpicking and Flyspecking Committee

Discussion: This tidies the wording of Article 4. It requires the current committee to administer the whole voting process rather than just the mail balloting, and directs the bidding committees to provide tellers rather than allowing them to provide observers. This changes the Constitution to reflect what actually happens, so there is no actual change in powers.

5.3 No-Zone Rotation

Moved: To amend Article IV by:

1. Deleting all of section 4.7 except the last sentence.

2. Replacing "sixty (60) " with ""five hundred (500) miles or eight hundred (800) kilometres" in the last sentence of section 4.7

3. Replacing "the North American region eligible" with "North America" in the first sentence of Section 4.9

4. Deleting the first sentence of 4.9.2

[Secretary: Old section 3.9, became new section 4.9 at the 1998 Business Meeting.]

Provided that any site which would have been eligible under the old rules will also be eligible in the first three races conducted under these eligibility rules.

Discussion:

This replaces the current zone system for site eligibility in North America with an unzoned system, in which a bid from any of the rotation zones is allowed to bid in any year. While the rotation system used to be necessary in order to prevent the Worldcon from staying in one geographic area, the decrease through the years in the number of locations that can hold a Worldcon will accomplish most of these results.

This system will also mean that if a group wishes to bid in a year, and has facilities available for that year, they will generally be eligible. And, if a group has its facility taken away by another group, it doesn't need to wait three years to rebid, but may do so when it is next able.

The exclusion zone is expanded from 60 miles to 500 to ensure that having a large number of local voters won't give one site a large proximity advantage in any race.

Moved by Ben Yalow and Bruce Pelz

Effect:

Section 4.7: Site Eligibility A site outside North America is eligible for selection in any year. A Site within North America is eligible for selection if it is within the appropriate region as defined below. The North American regions shall rotate in the order Western, Central, Eastern region. A site shall be ineligible if it is within sixty (60) five hundred (500) miles or eight hundred (800) kilometres of the site at which selection occurs.

Section 4.9: NASFiC

If the selected Worldcon site is not in North America, there shall be a NASFiC in the North American region eligible North America that year. Selection of the NASFiC shall be by the identical procedure to the Worldcon selection except as provided below or elsewhere in this Constitution:

4.9.1: Voting shall be by written ballot administered by the following year’s Worldcon, if there is no NASFiC in that year, or by the following year’s NASFiC, if there is one, with ballots cast at the administering convention or by mail, and with only members of the administering convention allowed to vote.

4.9.2: Bids are restricted to sites in the appropriate region. NASFiC Committees shall make all reasonable efforts to avoid conflicts with Worldcon dates.

4.9.3: The proposed NASFiC voting fee supporting membership rate can be set by unanimous agreement of the prospective candidates that file with the administering Committee the administering Committee and all bidding committees who have filed before the ballot deadline.

4.9.4: If "None of the Above" wins, or if no eligible bid files by the deadline, then no NASFiC shall be held and all voting fees any supporting membership payments collected for the NASFiC site selection shall be refunded by the administering convention without undue delay.

APPENDIX N - Proposed Agenda for Aussiecon Three

Outline Agenda for 1999

1. Committee Reports

1.1 Mark Protection Committee

1.2 Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee

1.3 Worldcon Runners Guide Editorial Committee

2. Worldcon Reports

2.1 Past Worldcons and NASFiCs

2.1.1 ConAdian (1994)

2.1.2 L.A.con III (1996)

2.1.3 LoneStarCon 2 (1997)

2.1.4 Bucconeer (1998)

2.1.5 Conucopia (1999 NASFiC)

2.2 Seated Worldcons

2.2.1 Aussiecon Three (1999)

2.2.2 Chicon 2000 (2000)

2.2.3 The Millennium Philcon (2001)

3. Business Passed On from Bucconeer

` 3.1 Tidying Site Selection

3.2 No-Zone Rotation

4. New Business

5. Site Selection Business

5.1 Report of the 2002 Site Selection & Presentation by Winners

5.2 Reports by seated Worldcons

5.3 Presentation by bidders for 2003

APPENDIX O - The Millennium Philcon PR0

Only the text of PR0 is included with the electronic version. The printed version includes a copy of this document.

MILLENNIUM PHILCON PROGRESS REPORT NUMBER 0

THE 59TH WORLD SCIENCE FICTION CONVENTION

Ben Franklin invites you to...

THE MILLENNIUM PHILCON

August 30th to September 3rd, 2001

The Pennsylvania Convention Center & Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA USA

Author Guest of Honor GREG BEAR

Artist Guest of Honor STEPHEN YOULL

Editor Guest of Honor GARDNER DOZOIS

Fan Guest of Honor GEORGE SCITHERS

Toastmaster ESTHER FRIESNER

Make Checks payable to: THE MILLENNIUM PHILCON

Memberships: Conversion from Supporting $60

New Attending $125

Child (Born after 9/1/89) $50

New Supporting $40

Rates good through 12/31/98

Presupporters, please contact us for rates.

SUITE 2001, 402 HUNTINGDON PIKE, 2001 ROCKLEDGE, PA 19046

 

E-MAIL: PHIL2001@NETAXS.COM

HTTP://WWW.NETAXS.COM/~PHIL2001

 

 

APPENDIX P - Magicon Financial Report

 

Magicon, has prepared this final report for the Bucconeer WSFS BM since FANAC, the 501(c)3 organization which ran Magicon has contributed its entire remaining funds to the Fan History Project which can be seen at fanac.org. The activity for the past year is:

$60889.92 Starting balance

$2240.42 Interest earned

$195.00 Dues paid

$3448.08 Spent on Computer equipment and software, exhibit shipping, and misc. for Fan History project

$300 Payment to SFSFS for use of copier

$600 Donation to SF Oral History project $180 Payment for lawyer to service mark Magicon

$58797.26 Balance at end of year.

This entire balance has been committed to the Fan History project.

APPENDIX Q - ConAdian Financial Report

CONADIAN

Financial Statement

 

Year Ending October 31, 1997

Reported in Canadian Dollars

Support & Revenue

Interest Income 3,209.00

Total Revenue & Support 3,209.00

Administrative Expenditures

Meeting Expenses 274.00

Misc. 170.00

Grants 400.00

Total Administrative Expenditures 844.00

Net 2,365.00

Funds in Accounts:

Checking & Savings 12,812.00

Long Term Investments 38,175.00

Total Funds in Accounts 51,987.00

 

 

 

note 1) official financial statements from independent C.A. not yet available, so some numbers have been estimated

prepared by Bruce Farr, CPA

 

APPENDIX R - Intersection Financial Report

INTERSECTION (Worldcon 1995)

Summary of total Income and Expense by type at 1st August 1998 (All figures in GBP)

INCOME GBP

Memberships (minus write-offs) 260,240

Dealers, Artists, Exhibits & Fan Fair 41,543

Merchandise & Advertising 31,043

Sponsorship (excl. Subvention) 15,296

Pass-Along Funds (Confrancisco, Conadian) 9,424

Bank Interest 7,197

Sundry Income 694

Net VAT (UK sales tax) 11,550

TOTAL 376,986

EXPENDITURE

Chair (2,674)

Operations (13,761)

Merchandise, Advertising, Promotions (15,035)

USA Division (16,037)

Member & Staff Services, Foreign Legion (17,508)

Finance (including Tax and accounting fees) (18,583)

Programme & WSFS (20,466)

Dealers, Artists, Exhibits & Fan Fair (33,126)

Publications (Net of Magicon Pass-along) (37,589)

Extravaganzas & Tech Ops (54,024)

Site (Net of subvention & recovery of party room hire) (137,243)

TOTAL (366,046)

Surplus of Income over Expenditure 10,940

DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS:

Donations to Fannish Causes:

APA:WSFS ($250) (161)

TAFF (1,500)

Critical Wave (350)

Science Fiction Foundation (3,000)

Thank-You Parties

Aibacon 96 (Glasgow) Thank-You Party (166)

LA Con Ill Thank-You Party & Advert ($892) (575)

UK Eastercon 97 Thank-You Party (1,381)

Pass Along Funds (1)

Worldcon 1997 - Lonestarcon ($2000) (1,290)

Worldcon 1998 - Bucconeer ($2000) (1,250)

Worldcon 1999 - Aussiecon ($2000) (1,267)

TOTAL Surplus disposed (10,940)

Cash in Hand 0

NOTES:

(1) LA Con III opted not to receive Pass-Along from Intersection in favour of the succeeding Worldcons.

These figures are based on the audited UK corporate reports. They are for information only.

All surplus having been accounted for, no further presentations to the WSFS business meeting will take place. Once a permanent archive of Intersection material is created on the WWW, the full finance figures will be included.

Vincent Docherty (Intersection Co-Chair & Head Finance) Email: vjd@compuserve.com

APPENDIX S - L.A. con III Financial Report

 

 

APPENDIX T - LoneStarCon II Financial Report

LSCII SUMMARY OF INCOME AND EXPENSES AS OF 6/30198

 

 

 

 

Income

Interest $17,500.00

Memberships $489,000.00

Space Rental (Dealers/Booth) $45,300.00

Sales/Royalties $6,250.00

Publications - Ads $15,250.00

Artist/Show $131,850.00

Donations $12,360.00

Pass-Along Funds $37,029.25

TOTAL $754,539.25

 

 

Expenses

Admin (office, telephone, postage,copies computers) $128,873.00

Chair (WSFS, Registration, site mtgs., misc) $19,500.00

Events (Hugos, Masq, Tech) $13,150.00

Exhibits (Art Show, Dealers, exhibit area) $18,780.00

Facilities (Hotel, Con Ctr, Insurance) $94,065.00

Programming (includes GOH exp) $8,425.00

Services (babysitting, handicapped, misc) $18,775.00

Art Show Payments to Artists $103,000.00

Reimburse Program Participants/Volunteers $82,000.00

Publications (Program Book, PR's, daily zine) $65,135.00

Tech (includes video production) $78,035.00

TOTAL $629,738.00

SURPLUS AS OF 6/30/98 $124,801.25

 

 

Please note these are not the final figures for LSCII, several large checks were written in the month of July, 1998, some invoices for LSCII have not yet been received. Also, additional income is still outstanding. A final report will be submitted to Aussiecon 1999

 

 

 

APPENDIX U - Bucconeer Financial Report

BucConeer, the 56th World Science Fiction Con.

Baltimore Worldcon 1998, Inc.

Balances as of 6 August, 1998 (COB)

Revenue

Memberships $467,658.00

Dealers Deposits $48,130.00

Investment Income $6,283.66

Pass Along LACon Ill $22,000.00

Advertisement Revenue $15,835.00

At-Con Revenue Still in Process or owed (estimated) $60,000.00

Other Revenue $2,463.52

TOTAL REVENUE $622,370.18

Expenses Incurred

Banking Expenses $5,254.64

Corporate Expenses $2,758.32

Misc. Convention Expenses $14,428.33

Publications $68,963.86

Managers Meetings $1,880.44

Flyers/Adver/Agents $7,458.79

Parties at Prior Worldcons $7,960.30

Computer Software & Equip $4,430.56

Facilities $78,698.00

Student Contest $3,487.00

Masquerarde $2,767.36

Bidding Expenses $5,500.00

Hugo Awards $7,118.37

Events $23,034.44

Transportation of Material $1,257.96

Tech Support $31,380.52

Office $12,523.56

Programming $28,247.92

Registration $8,213.50

Exhibits $2,586.39

Other Convention Expenses $28,875.65

Guests of Honor $6,210.09

Art Show $17,624.07

Actual Expenses Paid (to date) $370,660.07

Anticipated Expenses to be paid $243,000.00

TOTAL EXPENSES $613,660.07

ESTIMATED NET SURPLUS $8,710.11

 

 

 

APPENDIX V - Aussiecon Three Financial Report

As at the end of June 1998 (Australian Dollars)

Item Totals

Incomings

Memberships $131,599.58

Advertising $540.36

Pass-along Funds $42,592.83

Incoming Total $174,692.77

Outgoings

Finance Division

Account Fees $15.70

Credit Tax $80.89

Debit Tax $15.90

Merchant Fees $411.18

Membership refunds $500.00

Bid Expenses $165.69

Stale Cheque $12,903.22

Finance Total $14,092.58

Administration

Mail Room $319.68

Administration total $319.68

Chair Division

Board - Phone Calls $76.70

Chair Total $76.70

Facilities

Site Deposit $1,000.00

Facilities Total $1,000.00

Publications

Progress Reports $6,748.46

VotP $468.00

Publications Total $7,216.46

Publicity

General $1,119.06

Clubs $159.89

Conventions $150.00

Agents $171.75

Publicity Total $1,600.70

Outgoing Total $24,791.04

Balance $149,901.73